Would you get castrated if a new female urologist made it as easy as Dr. Kimmel?

[tattooed1 (imported)]

Just wondering how many of you would finally get castrated if a nice young female urologist added bilateral orchiectomy (castration) to her services stating that she would perform the surgery upon request?

Yes, I would !!!!!

[kitchkinet18 (imported)]

The doctor's gender doesn't matter to me. What does matter is that the procedure is done correctly and that the price is right. If she offered the procedure, i'd call and schedule an appointment very soon.

[rushsite (imported)]

Yes, I would accept the castration offer .... my castration was expensive and quite difficult to arrange. Contact me for PICs.

[Eunuchus (imported)]

I would love to have any doctor do it ,a female would be a definite bonus. Cost is another factor. I would prefer in St.Louis area. Maybe when they finally die it can get done.

[Riverwind (imported)]

Does it really matter if it is male or female urologist? Given that it would be accessible and no/mi

nimal amount of questions asked?

If the gender of the person removing your balls is relevant then

you probably shouldn't get castrated.

--LT

This is the only answer read the two posts attached by fhunter and Losethem.

It does not matter, if it does your not being castrated for the right reasons, anything else is fantasy.

River

[nonuts (imported)]

If it's about WHO is doing it, then you're doing it for the wrong reasons.

[robert moore (imported)]

I want my penis cut off and all that goes with it. Where do I sign up? rm

[SplitDik (imported)]

If it's about WHO is doing it, then you're doing it for the wrong reasons.

I don't think it is quite that clear cut. If you've wanted something for a long time and only get to do it once, then it isn't unreasonable to want to do it in a ceremoneous way. What you guys are saying is like saying "if you want a nice wedding then you're getting married for the wrong reasons". This can also be true (some women are more about the fantasy of a wedding than being married) but isn't really fair.

With all things equal, it is reasonable to want something done in a specific way. This thread was posed exactly that way -- if you had an equal choice, i.e. a woman doctor was just as easy as going to Kimmel, which would you choose.

However, in practice it really depends on the time frame and conditions. If you go for years obsessed with castration but won't do it because it isn't a woman doctor, then that is definitely a warning that your obsession is a fetish about the act.

Overall I think the more telling statement is related to chemical castration -- if you're not willing to try chemical castration then you're getting castrated for the wrong reasons. It is pretty ridiculous to want something but be unwilling to try it out. Some people may try chem castration and have other problems with it (I had a lot of problems with the diuretic effect of Siterone for example), but at least I tried it.

[Losethem (imported)]

Overall I think the more telling statement is related to chemical castration -- if you're not willing to try chemical castration then you're getting castrated for the wrong reasons. It is pretty ridiculous to want something but be unwilling to try it out. Some people may try chem castration and have other problems with it (I had a lot of problems with the diuretic effect of Siterone for example), but at least I tried it.

Umm... Chemical Castration wouldn't have been a relevant option for me, and I'm very happy having no balls. Chemical Castration isn't a cure-all try out for this. If the guy is simply distressed that he has balls hanging from his crotch but is otherwise happy with being male, then chemical castration may not be a good indicator of if he truly wants it. My case is a perfect example of this. I didn't want balls, I like being male. For me Castration with HRT was the right solution and I'm glad I did it. I knew that one day not having testosterone at all is a possibility, but I was wiling to accept that.

--LT

[nonuts (imported)]

Sorry we disagree. I don't see the simile in your wedding scenario at all. But, indeed, if someone was getting married just for the nice wedding I do think it would be for the wrong reasons.

This thread wasn't posed as an "with all things being equal" proposition in my reading of it. It was based on a proposal of IF a certain condition were met WOULD you then get castrated. My point was that, if, that is a condition upon being castrated it's being done for the wrong reason.

Sure, if a guy is GOING to be castrated anyways, and would prefer one way over another, and they have that option, they should do it the way they want. But, I maintain, that if it's a condition that must be met before they do it, then it's a bad idea.

Chemical castration is really on relevant for guys wishing to be castrated, and NOT have HRT. For a guy that has no desire to be a eunuch, and does not identify as a eunuch, chemical castration wouldn't be a test drive for anything.

I don't think it is quite that clear cut. If you've wanted something for a long time and only get to do it once, then it isn't unreasonable to want to do it in a ceremoneous way. What you guys are saying is like saying "if you want a nice wedding then you're getting married for the wrong reasons". This can also be true (some women are more about the fantasy of a wedding than being married) but isn't really fair.

With all things equal, it is reasonable to want something done in a specific way. This thread was posed exactly that way -- if you had an equal choice, i.e. a woman doctor was just as easy as going to Kimmel, which would you choose.

However, in practice it really depends on the time frame and conditions. If you go for years obsessed with castration but won't do it because it isn't a woman doctor, then that is definitely a warning that your obsession is a fetish about the act.

Overall I think the more telling statement is related to chemical castration -- if you're not willing to try chemical castration then you're getting castrated for the wrong reasons. It is pretty ridiculous to want something but be unwilling to try it out. Some people may try chem castration and have other problems with it (I had a lot of problems with the diuretic effect of Siterone for example), but at least I tried it.

[carl32536 (imported)]

I would gladly want her to at least remove one , and yes fantasy it may be but it would still be what I wish! And I would still have the other till the day its decided that it was time for it as well. I think I definetly need slowing down a bit lol! And people may not admit it but its always a fantasy until you make it a reality and all you can do is go by opinions unless you experience it yourself and you cant always get the best ideas from others who feel different on things than you think yourself.

[luke1812 (imported)]

Umm... Chemical Castration wouldn't have been a relevant option for me, and I'm very happy having no balls. Chemical Castration isn't a cure-all try out for this. If the guy is simply distressed that he has balls hanging from his crotch but is otherwise happy with being male, then chemical castration may not be a good indicator of if he truly wants it. My case is a perfect example of this. I didn't want balls, I like being male. For me Castration with HRT was the right solution and I'm glad I did it. I knew that one day not having testosterone at all is a possibility, but I was wiling to accept that.

--LT

Nice to read that I'm not alone in this issue. I am perfectly happy as a male, just unhappy with those swnging balls. Would be happy to hear how you are doing on hrt. My lady lover likes my balls as they are and waants me to keep them, but is open minded about my desires as long as we can still make passionate love.

[luke1812 (imported)]

Its definitely a positive incentive. I've always prefered female doctors anyway. But it would be even better if my lady were also a part of it. As a nurse, she's qualified, but she also on the side of keeping this fantasy in fantasy land.

[Losethem (imported)]

Nice to read that I'm not alone in this issue. I am perfectly happy as a male, just unhappy with those swnging balls. Would be happy to hear how you are doing on hrt. My lady lover likes my balls as they are and waants me to keep them, but is open minded about my desires as long as we can still make passionate love.

In my case I'd say she has nothing to worry about if you get your balls taken off so long as you take HRT/Testosterone after. I still function as I did before I was castrated but now I am not distressed about those foreign objects hanging off my crotch.

Now if your lady friend is expecting you to give her an injection of potent sperm, then you'll probably not want to do it right yet.

--LT

[thicklongrod7 (imported)]

I would be happy to have ANY doctor (male or female) castrate me if the price was right and there were no questions asked. I would even have my penis removed by the same. I just want it done. I have wanted this for a very long time. Someone hook me up with a doctor or if you know one, have them contact me at [email protected] I am in South Central Florida.

[luke1812 (imported)]

In my case I'd say she has nothing to worry about if you get your balls taken off so long as you take HRT/Testosterone after. I still function as I did before I was castrated but now I am not distressed about those foreign objects hanging off my crotch.

Now if your lady friend is expecting you to give her an injection of potent sperm, then you'll probably not want to do it right yet.

--LT

We are both well beyond child rearing, so potent sperm isn't an issue. A great friendship and a great sex life fulfilling each others fantasies are all we need. Although, this particular fantasy she prefers to keep in roll playing rather than reality.

[gandalf (imported)]

I would be happy to have ANY doctor (male or female) castrate me if the price was right and there were no questions asked. I would even have my penis removed by the same.

I would do the same thing. If I could my penis removed with no hassle,I would do it in a heartbeat.

[gmsvdmvs (imported)]

I should prefer a women because she knows what the best is for us. I think their too much taboo around neutering men and it is not the and of their live but is better for them and their wife too. A women must have the rights to castrate her husband if she wants,but if he doesn't want it OK but he must leave the home then. Women must be more protected against violance and so give them the power they need.

It is difficult to be castrated because it is illigal,but my women would love it because she has no sexdrive anymore and i have still a lot. the famillie is completed so it wouldn't be a problem for her,and i should come more docile and obident and less violence to her if she doesn't want sex

[unencumbered (imported)]

Both of my testicles were removed by female surgeons.

[butterflyjack (imported)]

Would that be several women surgeons, Unencumbered? Sounds wonderful....?? Jackie

[unencumbered (imported)]

Would that be several women surgeons, Unencumbered? Sounds wonderful....?? Jackie

They were removed individually at different times, both by different individual women physicians, both with several all female nurses assisting in the surgeries.

[hazbalz (imported)]

Guess I missed this thread last fall. The answer is NO. The gender of the surgeon should not matter, its the competence. I posted awhile back about having a mole removed from my penis by my dermatologist, a very attractive woman, using a scapel. I was just happy that she is skilled and noticed the mole was raised and possibly pre-cancerous. I thought it was just a freckle.

[considering (imported)]

To take this utterly foolish argument to some sort of further stupidity....about two months ago I had a total shoulder replacement, great success, the doctor is very proud of his work as well he should be. But...several people have said to me...weren't you concerned? He's Chinese you know and the situation with China....well, I'd be on my guard". After I heard this ridiculousness I pointed out that he is ethnic Chinese, his family has lived in the United States for five generations and he was born in Chicago. That didn't settle them. They started to say..."but what if his relatives in China....." and I walked away. My point here is that we should see any medical professional regardless as to their sex, sexual preference, country of origin, religious preference or colour. In a couple of weeks I'm having my Colonoscopy-every three years-that doctor is from Egypt and I have no concerns nor should I have.

If we go to a particular physician, surgeon or other medical person because of some characteristic then we have made the first of a number of errors. My dermatologist is a woman and I no more believe she understands skin because she's a woman than she believes I under shaving because I'm a man. She's an expert and that's what I want. It's what we all should want. Why we don't eludes me but, read above, and you'll find the dissenting speeches from those who feel we should select a doctor based on sex. We all have our own opinions.

[butterflyjack (imported)]

I concur completely, considering..But ..all things being equal, I'd prefer dealing with a woman...I feel more comfortable around women...Thanks...

And..unencumbered...Sounds wonderful...smooches Jackie

[cutoneuk (imported)]

I agree with the people that say the sex of the Doctor does not matter. I want to be a eunuch and I would not let the sex of the doctor prevent me from achieving this.