EA Forums

I know what you mean. Having had RIC in the late 60's, I have the same issue with the few and far between erections. The scrotum extends about halfway up the shaft. Makes for a nice, hairy, and really unattractive erection unless totally shaved. I do have a frenum, but oddly enough, it's not very sensitive?

Here s dumb question from me, how do you know if you have a naturally hairy penis shaft or if you got infant circumcised so tight that it pulled some of your scrotum up onto your penis shaft ?

If you got circed that tight, it would shorten your scrotum and how low your balls hang. And it would make it tougher to grow to your maximum erect penis dimensions at puberty. Fucked over in 2 ways.

I have always had hair further up my dick than I like before and after circumcised at 33.

Seems nice to be tight after a circ?

Sparkey49,

That s a perfect answer in proving some men are hairy up their shafts even if they are uncircumcised. The uncircumcised men can answer this question the best, or men that got circed after puberty who know how much was cut off and what shaft hair they had before getting circed.

Infant circed men can t tell how much some dr cranked up and pulled on their foreskins when they got circed. So its tough to know how big a slab of skin got cut off as infants.

Yeah, it makes sense in concept to circ tight if you re gonna circ at all.

But being cut high and tight as an infant, My erections did hurt in puberty and I sure thought frequently at those times how that dumb ass drs cut me way too far up my shaft and way too tight to let my true erection dimemsions expand to their maximum size. It always feels like my penis body when erect is too big to be able to fit inside my dick skin that was cut off too tight !

Some loose extra foreskin sure would be better when erect. I m sure it prevented my erections for growing as big as they could have grown if I wasn t circumcised and if I had retained lots of excess foreskin to fully erect into.

I was voluntary circed in December 2016. Here in europe it's not very common, only if there are medical reason for it, but you can do it voluntray, if you pay the bill yourself. I like the result. I didn't feel a big differnce, but that's my personal view.

It seems like some men say they don t feel much difference in sexual pleasures after getting circumcised as adults so they can compare sex and masturbation cut and uncut. Some adult circed men claim they lose some sensation and pleasure after getting circed. Seems like sensations in the penis are different in different men.

It does help us forcibly cut men to think maybe we d be one of the no difference in pleasure men. But there s no way to know with us infant circed men. No way to know how it affected our pleasures or erection sizes. Circumcision does make masturbation more difficult and less pleasurable than a long foreskin surrounding the penis to smoothly stroke up and down with minimum lubrication needed. And all cut male nudists need protection from getting sunburned penis heads that uncut men don t need to worry about. I m sure the more any male goes naked, the more protective and useful a foreskin is to him.

When I ve shared showers and living space with men from other countries where circumcision is rare, my extreme high and tight circ gets a lot of long looks, like crazy Americans really chop their sons dicks back too far. No men say it but their expressions show suprise at seeing so much of my foreskin missing and my entire frenulum precisely carved off my penis and missing for no medical reason.

What do men in other countries think of us forcibly infant circed men ? Do they think Americans are fooled into routine infant circumcision? Or does it seem like religious superstition carried to an extreme by some backward people, or what ?

I m curious what boys and men in cultures that don t circumcise much think and hear about circumcised penises ? And what they hear and think growing up about why some cultures, like Americans, circumcise so many of their males forcibly as infants ? Its has to be known and talked about in other cultures. Especially seeing so many circumcised Americans all over the world for decades.

Paragraphs. Paragraphs, my son.

Hahaha, yeah my mind goes and changes course way faster than I can type lol. I m lucky when my big ape hands don t hit multiple keys at the same time.

I have to admit the idea of circumcision is strange to me. I can appreciate that some people do it for religious reasons but i cant see any other reason to do it? Is anyone pro circumcision?

I was cut a birth, I Wish I wasn't, but nobody asked, I just remember waking up my 3rd day and my foreskin was gone, watch out for thieves in hospitals.

Chrissym (imported) wrote: Sat Mar 24, 2018 7:44 pm I have to admit the idea of circumcision is strange to me. I can appreciate that some people do it for religious reasons but i cant see any other reason to do it? Is anyone pro circumcision?

Here in the US it's the opposite! Most boys still have it done for health/hygiene reasons.

Studies of men and boys in cultures were males are not circumcised prove how few medical problems uncircumcised penises have and how rarely circs are done to solve any problems,. Even in countries with poor hygiene available, uncirced penises stay healthy.

I believe males are shamed into silence as fathers and females push for it as mothers along with the medical mafia making tons of money on circs and selling foreskins they charge money to cut off.

Most American men are too embarrassed to talk about their own circumcisions and why men get circed at all. Like one buddy said, I m glad I can t remember being circed as an infant. It must have hurt like hell. Can you imagine being cut like thst with no painkillers ?

American women just seem brainwashed into wanting their babies circed. Almost like inventing cutting off all men s outer ears or fingernails and toenails to be cleaner and easier to keep clean without them. And then mothers start insisting their infant boys lose both ears and all fingernails right after birth. And the fathers and other men being called perverts and pedophils if they even question or challenge the removals in their own sons.

And then all males being shamed into not even discussing their ears and fingernails as being perverts or queers or pedophiles if they disuss ears or fingernails.

The medical industry could make tons of money cutting off ears and fingrrnails and claiming its less to clean and maintain for males.

Females could

cutnbulls2ox (imported) wrote: Sun Feb 25, 2018 11:24 am ask boyfriends and husbands to get

their ears and fingernails removed because they will look better without them or because the females dads and brothers had theirs cut off and she is used to males missing ears and fingernails growing up.

And religions could claim male ears and fingernails should be removed to please God and make a covenant with God that only males need to be cut to create, not any females being cut for God. Somehow only males need this covenant and to get cut to please God.

All completely horseshit and invented to cut and deprive males of healthy and useful, protective body parts, and not removing any parts from females.

Any body parts could be similarly targeted for similar reasons. Its a fraud being encouraged by greedy medical people and perverted religious leaders.

I am not pro circumcising infants but growing up not knowing any other boys that weren't except two of my three brothers did have a mental affect on me. I chose to get circumcised at 33.

I wasn't given any choice on my son, his mother got to make the choice, here in the U.S. 25 years ago. It was done so he would look like his older brother.

Another confirmation that much of routine infant circumcision is caused by females getting the final say over fathers combined with a very greedy medical industry negating males choices on male sexual anatomy.

cutnbulls2ox (imported) wrote: Mon Mar 26, 2018 2:38 am Another confirmation that much of routine infant circumcision is caused by females getting the final say over fathers combined with a very greedy medical industry negating males choices on male sexual anatomy.

Mothers who choose to get their sons circumcised, do they have intention to have sex with them ?

No, I m saying that a lot of females behave as though their choice is far more important than their son s and the father s choices, preferences, legal RIGHTS, and decisions on whether to get their sons circumcised at birth. Where is the father s and son s rights carried out on the son s male anatomy ? Its not the mother s body, remember that favorite female rights chant, my body, my rights, constantly cheered by so many females, who then openly violate that same claimed right with their defenseless infant son s body, not her body, for their own whims, not for any medical necessity.

How many American mothers and hospitals and drs let fathers exclusively and permanently decide to cut off ( or let medical staff do it) and modify their daughter s sexual anatomy for his mere whims and completely ignoring the mother s choice and the daughter s choices and all female legal rights in making decisions ? When do fathers alone make that similar cut and mutilate decision that is carried out solely on that female infant s body ?

And then these very same females cry out and condemn and protest any form of female genital mutilation, along with the same corrupt medical industry that advocates and eagerly and profitably carries out routine infant male genital mutilations that clearly violate the father s and male infant s legal rights to please the whims of the mother.

Just look how blatently rotten, corrupt, and unfair this is to males. And how unjustly and unequally males legal rights are treated by totally, knowingly, and intentionally corrupt American judges, laws, and courts.

cutnbulls2ox (imported) wrote: Thu Mar 22, 2018 2:03 am It seems like some men say they don t feel much difference in sexual pleasures after getting circumcised as adults so they can compare sex and masturbation cut and uncut. Some adult circed men claim they lose some sensation and pleasure after getting circed. Seems like sensations in the penis are different in different men.

From what I have read, there doesn't seem to be any scientific evidence that circumcision has any negative impact on sensitivity.

One recent study:

MYTH: Men who are uncircumcised enjoy better sex lives

FALSE: Researchers at the Louisiana State University School of Medicine studied 15 men who underwent circumcision as adults.

They found that there was no statistically significant difference in sex drive, erection, ejaculation, or overall satisfaction.

Also:

...Circumcision is the answer, according to a team of experts at the University of Chicago.

They found the simple op made sex more enjoyable for two thirds of blokes.

The researchers were tasked with looking at a man's sexual pleasure, and function in the bedroom - as well as the risk of injury during sex.

The 362 men taking part were quizzed six and 24 months after having their circumcision.

...The researchers said: "The study confirmed men's long-term satisfaction with the outcome of their voluntary medical male circumcision.

"It improved sexual pleasure and function for most men and significantly decreased coital injuries."

Of the 362 circumcised men taking part, 98 per cent reported being happy with their op.

Most, 95 per cent, told researchers their female partners were satisfied after the procedure.

And, two thirds (67 per cent) reported enjoying sex more post-op, the findings published in The Journal of Sexual Medicine found.

Furthermore, 94 per cent were very satisfied or somewhat satisfied with sex afterwards.

And their sexual function - the ability to do the deed - improved, while the likelihood of injury fell.

Modern medicine is fucking bullshit ! Physicians are only pushers for pharmaceutical companies. They don't want to admit that natural healing is way better their godamned pills. People only pay attention to those who support old traditions but there are plenty of physicians and psychologists who condemn circumcision and very few pay attention to what they are saying. The physicians who brought this barbaric procedure over 150 years ago, have lied to parents, saying that masturbation leads to blindness. Needless to say that parents were scared to death and physicians proposed circumcision to stop boys from masturbating, only to please religious leaders. Since then, circumcision was used to prevent or cure over 50 diseases. All were proven to be false and the lies go on. Nowadays, it's to prevent HIV infection and also to prevent prostate cancer. Once again that's fucking bullshit, if that was true

paring (imported) wrote: Sat Nov 18, 2017 1:46 am USA would have the lowest rate

in the world for these two diseases. The countries who detain the lowest rate of these two diseases are also the countries where the circumcision rate are the lowest. There plenty of adult men who got circumcised to be like others and regretted it because of lost of sensitivity and people don't pay attention to what they say. This bullshit must stop ! Nothing is better than natural.

I just wish all males were left intact and allowed to decide for themselves at age 18. That would make everyone happy !

Anyone wanting control over other males penises and foreskins is clearly in the wrong, parents included.

Its his foreskin, let him decide freely at age 18 ,

YOU CAN ALWAYS CIRCUMCISE LATER, YOU CAN T UNCIRCUMCISE AFTER ITS CUT OFF.