EA Forums

squeezem (imported) wrote: Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:39 pm What about precum?...do eunuchs still get that?

Without Testosterone (not taking HRT) for most no precum, cum or intrust in sex but your mileage my very

_g

_g (imported) wrote: Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:06 am Without Testosterone (not taking HRT) for most no precum, cum or intrust in sex but your mileage my very

_g

Pretty much says it all for me: no pre-cum, reduced ejaculate and no interest in sex most of the time.

For me, no pre-cum (never was), reduced (not absent) interest in sex, fewer erections, erections not rigid enough for penetration, much less ejaculate volume, reduced penis size, stimulation and orgasm feel different (less intense among less describable changes). I am not now using testosterone, I was castrated over five years ago. --FLO--

First and for most I am new to the forum. About me I suck at sentence structure and don't spell worth a crud, but if you need an Oracle database worked I am the guy. lol Anyway I have had 1 ball for 10 yrs (46yr old) and the other has been nothing but hyroceils and epididimitis problems. Well guess what..... it is leaving my body 29 Jan 13. So I have been on Androgel for a year for low testosterone. Before the TRT it would take about 30 mins to get off after a sweaty workout (trying to get the feeling) sexing my GF and the cum was mostly clear but good volume, about 2 really good squirts (great feeling orgasm). After TRT about a month things seemed to change alot, I got horny if the wind blew the right direction and I can cum in 5 min or nearly at will. It is no longer mostly clear it is sorta chunky white thick stuff but less volume but still awesome to pump!

Ok now.... lets expirement but we have to wait. I have developed a sort of fetish for getting rid of the second and can't wait for the empty sac to shrink up against me (may get skin removed later) but I want to continue the TRT from now until about 1 month after orchiectomy then stop and document the day to day change and try to either have sex or masterbate every 2 or 3 days,:) which is easy now, and tell you the difference. What do you think? Intrest in following this? I will be graphic in detail. Actually if you are wanting results -you- ask me what you want me to do and I will give it a try (only TRT related no estrogen LOL). I am naturally a horny person and even with 275 T without TRT I could continue a boner like I almost could not get rid of it but it was hard to climax.

Of course after the test I will start TRT again....I love to be horny so can't do it for a long time plus hot flashes are going to suck cuz I get them now if I stop TRT more than a week ( I had to try it ).

Patrick,

"

Patrickchemcast (imported) wrote: Mon Jan 07, 2013 11:58 am I am very satisfied with the results, but wonder to what extent the penis will shrink, the sac looks about the same externally, even though it's far from being filled like before. Will it shrink ? How long do you suggest I wai

Hash (imported) wrote: Mon Jan 07, 2013 7:37 pm t before having my balls removed, and later the sac ?

As for your penis shrinking, your mileage may vary. Everyone is different, it just depends on your body. Mine has shrunk at least three inches over several years and I use a small dose of HRT. My penis gets very small at times, sometimes only the very tip protrudes and if I swim it disappears almost completely. Sometimes when I'm warm it's about four inches, but the girth is a lot smaller too. Haven't measured it in a long time, but it's not much more than a quarter in diameter most times. However, some eunuchs have very little shrinkage. As for your testicles, all I know is that atrophied organs, like testicles, carry a higher risk of cancer. I'd go see a female urologist and without saying much about removal, just tell her that they don't seem to be functioning and that you're having sexual problems. She'll do the rest. Testing first and then when she says they're not functioning, tell her that you want them removed because of your fear of cancer. Female doctors/urologists are more likely to suggest removal in my opinion. From my experience with male urologist

s, they're more hesitant or resistant unless they're cancerous.

That is what I did, found a female urologist and after 6 mo ask for my last to be removed and as I asked it is on 29 Jan 13. Already on TRT

Eunuch1438 (imported) wrote: Thu Jan 10, 2013 11:52 am That is what I did, found a female urologist and after 6 mo ask for my last to be removed and as I asked it is on 29 Jan 13. Already on TRT

I'm curious to know what you told your urologist to convince her to remove it since even female ones are trained not to remove them unless there is the possible presence of cancer. From my understanding, atrophied testicles are no enough reason to have them removed or even the fact that they are "nonfunctional" or that they are causing pain or that you are already on TRT due to low testosterone. I'm not convinced that the increased possibility of getting cancer in the atrophied testicle is enough reason to convince the surgeon to remove it for prophylactic reasons. What am I missing? Is it just because females, not being male, often have a different perspective on this and are more willing to ignore protecol?

What you say to your Urological Surgeon can have an enormouse difference in the outcome. This isn't to infer that they wouldn't do a professional job but if they are made aware that post surgery, you'd like to be able to get and maintain an erection then they can work to see if that's possible. For anyone who uses any method of castration other than surgical, what you'll end up with is a crap shoot. If you've injected yourself with whatever in advance, that can make a difference. Once a substance is admitted to the body, no matter the site of injection, there is always the possiblity that it will find other, unrelated areas and have an effect. In a gross example, it's like giving someone an alcohol enema to get them drunk. The anus isn't a proper receptor for the ingredients to act on the nisle (Sp?) bodies that control the flow of blood to the brain but it works just the same. (It's also highly toxic; There have been a number of cases of homicide that were found to be such because one person gave another the alcohol a toxic enema of alcohol, in one case, hot cocoa mixed with Irish Whiskey....).

In advance of my surgery, I had a talk with my surgeon on precisely that topic and he said he'd make an effort. Admittedly, I am not young so that has to be listed as a causative factor but...I can and do get erection without other stimulation other than my own brain and can produce ejactulate. Of course, it's not fertile but, at my age, I should have no expectations that it would be.

unencumbered (imported) wrote: Thu Jan 10, 2013 10:23 pm I'm curious to know what you told your urologist to convince her to remove it since even female ones are trained not to remove them unless there is the possible presence of cancer. From my understanding, atrophied testicles are no enough reason to have them removed or even the fact that they are "nonfunctional" or that they are causing pain or that you are already on TRT due to low testosterone. I'm not convinced that the increased possibility of getting cancer in the atrophied testicle is enough reason to convince the surgeon to remove it for prophylactic reasons. What am I missing? Is it just because females, not being male, often have a different perspective on this and are more willing to ignore protecol?

I went for 6 mo 2 visits about pain. Went and had an ulrasound and found epididmitis and hydrocele. Got results over the phone and ok yes there was a visit to get the antibiotics. So the 3rd visit was the charm so to say. I told the doc it was still in pain and litteraly asked to have it removed.

zipher66

I think this is the only solution.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ls1fe7jRAzo