EA Forums

There are many reason for men to get castrated. For me it is that I can better control my sex drive and that I am an ideal bottom for a lot of gays when castrated.

Bernhard (imported) wrote: Tue Aug 18, 2020 7:52 am There are many reason for men to get castrated. For me it is that I can better control my sex drive and that I am an ideal bottom for a lot of gays when castrated.

Are you still interested in bottoming Bernhard, when castrated? One of the most enjoyable and productive sides of it for me, is the total loss of interest.

I wonder if the question is phrased correctly. One way would be, "Would you object to being castrated." The other way would be, roughly, "If the function of your testicles could be performed internally, without needing to have this sensitive part of your body external and exposed to injury, would you still prefer having them outside?"

I think most men would say "No" to the first question, "Yes" to the second.

cutnbulls2ox (imported) wrote: Sun Aug 02, 2020 12:25 am I have talked online with a few men who never want to explain or discuss why they want to get castrated so much, or what their goal is in getting castrated.

Obviously the first thing that you think up is that maybe they have strong sexual urges that would get them in tons of legal troubles and ruin their lives, like rape or child sex abuse. Problems and urges that they want to prevent. Men who desire castration, or who would benefit from castration for these kinds of reasons, should be able to walk in and get free, safe castrations on request to prevent these kinds of crimes. This would easily save their future crime victims and also these men from all of the trauma sexual crimes produce. One simple free and safe castration could save taxpayers lots of money in police, court, and prison costs. Implant a pair of artificial balls in their scrotums and give them lose dose testosterone, and even their female sex partners, families, best friends, and gym partners would not know they were castrated.

I wonder about part of your comment. In several articles discussing chemical castration of sexual offenders, I've seen the argument that malice and violence is in the brain and not in the balls. This sounds quite reasonable to me.

cutnbulls2ox (imported) wrote: Sun Aug 02, 2020 12:12 am The injury and medically neceassry castrations seem to be the biggest reason men would regret their castrations. What has caused you to now prefer being a eunuch ?

After the initial shock of loosing my balls abated I began to enjoy what some have called the "eunuch calm", an almost zen like feeling. I notice my daily tension subside and my temper basically disappearing. I remained sexual and yet if my wife was not in the mood I'd just give her a kiss and forget about sex, where as before I would get mad and pout for days. I felt more in control of my libido and not driven by it. I did not like the empty scrotum but once I had it removed the smooth area became very erogenous. Them my wife said she was really enjoying having a Eunuch for a husband. I was a better, more attentive lover and without testosterone driving me she had no worries I'd leave her for a younger woman. There's more, but that's basically why I'd never want balls again.

Seanthomas ... understand your change. Mine was due to a mutual decision with my wife (mismatched libido). But, we experienced all you talked about. Have not removed the empty scrotum. Has been about ten months since my orchiectomy, seems fine having the extra flap.

I recently had to go back on testosterone due to bone strength (cracked bones). In two weeks will start on a bone-strengthening injection (after my dental procedure) which should allow us to go off of the testosterone. I am sure my wife will also be more at ease.

Don

DonnyMac (imported) wrote: Wed Aug 19, 2020 8:19 am Seanthomas ... understand your change. Mine was due to a mutual decision with my wife (mismatched libido). But, we experienced all you talked about. Have not removed the empty scrotum. Has been about ten months since my orchiectomy, seems fine having the extra flap.

I recently had to go back on testosterone due to bone strength (cracked bones). In two weeks will start on a bone-strengthening injection (after my dental procedure) which should allow us to go off of the testosterone. I am sure my wife will also be more at ease.

Don

Yes, TRT did not agree with me. Swollen prostate, excessive hemoglobin and mood swings as well as other unpleasant issues led me to pursue low dose estrogen as an alternative. It takes the male body some time to grow accustomed to estrogen and I've read it's like going through puberty again. However, once settled you feel good, have protection against osteoporosis and the mental fog of being without any hormones. The down side is increased boob growth (already a side effect of castration) but I'd rather have boobs as a compromise for strong bones and a sharper mind. Now as for the scrotum removal that was the best decision I made after the orchiectomy. It's incredibly comfortable and highly erogenous as a bonus. And personally both the wife and I prefer the smooth appearance. But in the end it all boils down to personal preference and if you like the empty scrotum by all means keep it.

Wannabe2 (imported) wrote: Wed Aug 19, 2020 2:59 am I wonder about part of your comment. In several articles discussing chemical castration of sexual offenders, I've seen the argument that malice and violence is in the brain and not in the balls. This sounds quite reasonable to me.

I ve read similar articles. But common sense tells me that males before puberty with low testosterone and limp penises are not rapists and rarely child abusers. Those sexual aggressive actions start after testosterone enables sexual functions and sexual desires. Castration without adding any testosterone after neutering would be alot like puberty in reverse. The loss of all sexual ability and desire might not cure anger problems. But it would likely make those anger problems less sexual or non sexual anger or impossible to sexually perform unless the man retains his sexual erections and desires with no testicles and no added testosterone. It would de sexualize a significant number of gelded men.

racerboy (imported) wrote: Wed Aug 19, 2020 1:52 am I wonder if the question is phrased correctly. One way would be, "Would you object to being castrated." The other way would be, roughly, "If the function of your testicles could be performed internally, without needing to have this sensitive part of your body external and exposed to injury, would you still prefer having them outside?"

I think most men would say "No" to the first question, "Yes" to the second.

I agree that many men do enjoy having balls externally for sexual pleasure from touching and handling them and the great pleasure nerves in scrotums and testicles and nut cords. If they were internal like ovaries, men would lose those intense pleasures.

Most young males engage in sack tap games and contests with other males to hit and be hit in their balls during puberty. This is both desiring the intense pain of hits in their own growing gonads and liking to show off how much of a man they and their friends are to everyone, measured and openly demonstrated to all onlookers in how much pain their testicles feel now that they are maturing into men.

Would you object to being castrated ? No. I m guessing this answer of no would come mostly from men over 45 who are done making babies and have enjoyed decades of sex. Most boys and younger men would object to being castrated. At least until after they finish impregnating and having babies as much as they want and enjoying years of great sex.

If all men with wives past menopause could openly have sex with men or younger women, with no guilt or hurt feeling from their wives, I would bet that few men would choose castration.

Cseriess (imported) wrote: Tue Aug 18, 2020 11:01 pm Are you still interested in bottoming Bernhard, when castrated? One of the most enjoyable and productive sides of it for me, is the total loss of interest.

I agree that the most enjoyable and productive sides of

castration *could be* to be calm. At the moment I cannot judge because I have not yet been castrated.

I'd still want to carry them, like a security blanket. They'd still belong to me afterall

cutnbulls2ox (imported) wrote: Wed Aug 19, 2020 5:21 pm I agree that many men do enjoy having balls externally for sexual pleasure from touching and handling them and the great pleasure nerves in scrotums and testicles and nut cords. If they were internal like ovaries, men would lose those intense pleasures.

But.... If you never had them, you wouldn't miss them! Besides, just think of all the times when they caused you pain or embarrassment. Itching in public and you just have to scratch or adjust while in public or with someone you don't want too be obvious with. Ever catch them in your zipper? Ever sit wrong and squish one? Ever get hit there on purpose or by accident. And no, I've never participated in hitting them for pleasure. Sounds very neanderthal to me. I would have been much happier had none of that happened.

...

cutnbulls2ox (imported) wrote: Wed Aug 19, 2020 5:06 pm males before puberty with low testosterone and limp penises are not rapists and rarely child abusers....

That's what my common sense tells me too. But, I had a few experiences when I was in first and second grade, two guys (independently), both elder than I by one or two years, so yes, before puberty. They both were children too. And I was young and dumb and willing to play. But nowadays, I think this would be called sexual abuse.

It looks like, to qualify, rapists and child abusers must be adult. Can't agree with this image.

Here is a quote on the subject of men and their testicles from the non-fiction book about the Viet Nam war called Dispatches by Michael Herr: "Anxiety was a luxury, a joke you had no room for once you knew the variet of deaths and mutilations the war offered. Some feared head wounds, some dreaded chest woulds or stomach wounds, everyone feared the would of wounds, the Wound. Guys would pray and pray--Just You and me, God. Right?--offer anything, if only they could be spared that. Take my legs, take my eyes, take my fucking life, You Bastard, but please, please, please, don't take those. Whenever a shell landed in a group, everyone forgot about the next rounds and skipped back to rip their pants away, to check, laughing hysterically with relief even though their legs might be shattered, their kneecaps torn away, kept upright by their relief and shock, gratitude and adrenaline."

from my experience of being castrated due to medical reasons at a young age, while I did not want to lose them at the time, I am perfectly happy without them now and would honestly likely not take them back if I could. So much less to worry about, and while HRT isnt as good as having balls, its not terrible either

Jonathan (imported) wrote: Fri Aug 21, 2020 5:17 am Here is a quote on the subject of men and their testicles from the non-fiction book about the Viet Nam war called Dispatches by Michael Herr: "Anxiety was a luxury, a joke you had no room for once you knew the variet of deaths and mutilations the war offered. Some feared head wounds, some dreaded chest woulds or stomach wounds, everyone feared the would of wounds, the Wound. Guys would pray and pray--Just You and me, God. Right?--offer anything, if only they could be spared that. Take my legs, take my eyes, take my fucking life, You Bastard, but please, please, please, don't take those. Whenever a shell landed in a group, everyone forgot about the next rounds and skipped back to rip their pants away, to check, laughing hysterically with relief even though their legs might be shattered, their kneecaps torn away, kept upright by their relief and shock, gratitude and adrenaline."

Young men on the doorstep of decades of great sex, fatherhood, and finally enjoying their fully grown manhood do value their balls to an amount that is very likely higher than at any other time in their lives. A bunch of 18 to 24 year olds will miss their balls far more than most older or younger males. Pre puberty males won t value their balls nearly that highly. They have not experienced the great value of working balls and sex yet. Ask them again at age 35 or 50 years old, and their balls will not be valued so high above their lives and other body parts. Ask them again after age 70 and their balls have moved way down the list of their most important body parts. Its a natural change in value over time in each male s life span.

chrisbinalman (imported) wrote: Fri Aug 21, 2020 9:56 am from my experience of being castrated due to medical reasons at a young age, while I did not want to lose them at the time, I am perfectly happy without them now and would honestly likely not take them back if I could. So much less to worry about, and while HRT isnt as good as having balls, its not terrible either

You handled that really well and at such a young age. You give hope to other young men who are facing similar losses and letting them know its not so bad. Were you past puberty and enjoying them or too young to know what you d be missing.

It seems like drs hardly give any counseling to young eunuchs when they cut them. They just say the minimum over used blow off garbage, don t discuss any options with the patient, and say too bad kid. The parents don t know what to say. And the new eunuch has to handle it alone with no help from anyone and no other males understanding what he is going through. Or feeling.

cutnbulls2ox (imported) wrote: Sat Aug 22, 2020 3:49 am You handled that really well and at such a young age. You give hope to other young men who are facing similar losses and letting them know its not so bad. Were you past puberty and enjoying them or too young to know what you d be missing.

It seems like drs hardly give any counseling to young eunuchs when they cut them. They just say the minimum over used blow off garbage, don t discuss any options with the patient, and say too bad kid. The parents don t know what to say. And the new eunuch has to handle it alone with no help from anyone and no other males understanding what he is going through. Or feeling.

I actually had the opposite experience , my doctor was more than willing to work with me and my girl friend [who I am still dating] to work out any issues and figure out how to have sex again. Honestly though it was mainly my girl friend who got me through it, her being willing to stick through about six months of mood swings was the best help I could had have

Congratulations. You have found keepers. Both your doctor and your girl friend.

chrisbinalman (imported) wrote: Sat Aug 22, 2020 7:57 am I actually had the opposite experience , my doctor was more than willing to work with me and my girl friend [who I am still dating] to work out any issues and figure out how to have sex again. Honestly though it was mainly my girl friend who got me through it, her being willing to stick through about six months of mood swings was the best help I could had have

I've said it often that what medical literature that is available regarding post castration is outdated and vague. And what scant research is done these days involves androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer patients who are usually well over sixty years old. So basically all doctors read the same thing and pass on the same drivel to their patients. Well, it's fundamentally wrong and while hormones undeniably play a role, human sex drive is influenced my other factors. Unless there is a separate physical issue with erectile dysfunction castrated men are perfectly able to achieve an erection. They can achieve orgasm and ejaculation. Even with ED the penis remains sensitive and responsive to stimulation. I cannot speak for all castrated men but personally I am still sexually active (despite unrelated ED) and much of that results from my attitude and understanding spouse.

rogerwpbfl (imported) wrote: Wed Aug 19, 2020 11:29 pm I'd still want to carry them, like a security blanket. They'd still belong to me afterall

Like on a big, heavy, double medalion necklace ? The ultimate dog tags of belonging to the eunuch brotherhood.

seanthomas (imported) wrote: Sun Aug 23, 2020 11:50 pm Unless there is a separate physical issue with erectile dysfunction castrated men are perfectly able to achieve an erection. They can achieve orgasm and ejaculation. Even with ED the penis remains sensitive and responsive to stimulation. I cannot speak for all castrated men but personally I am still sexually active (despite unrelated ED) and much of that results from my attitude and understanding spouse.

True every time I have quit T in the past I usually remained fairly sexually active. Although libido is a whole lot less and my erections aren't as full as they would be when on T.

same as the guys above, I am actually more sexually active, primary due to no risk being involved in knocking up my girlfriend, post castration than pre. in my mind its mostly a state of mind thing that people get that would prevent them from having fun

chrisbinalman (imported) wrote: Mon Aug 24, 2020 4:22 am same as the guys above, I am actually more sexually active, primary due to no risk being involved in knocking up my girlfriend, post castration than pre. in my mind its mostly a state of mind thing that people get that would prevent them from having fun

@chrisbinalman -- Do you still have ur scrotum? I know that has a lot of nerves in it and is sensitive. I'm missing that now without my ballast so I don't have that stimulation anymore.

JockItch (imported) wrote: Mon Aug 24, 2020 5:50 am @chrisbinalman -- Do you still have ur scrotum? I know that has a lot of nerves in it and is sensitive. I'm missing that now without my ballast so I don't have that stimulation anymore.

I'm just the opposite. The area where my ball sack was removed is highly sensitive and erogenous, much more so than when the empty sack was there. Go figure.......