EA Forums

Are there any women out there that would like to talk to my wife about getting me castrated? I can tell that she really wants it primarily to decrease my libido. She is tired of me being interested in other women and waking her up at 4 am for sex. But, I think she secretly is thrilled by it as well. She seemed excited when I first mentioned it when I was afraid she would kick me out as a freak. Also, she has always obviously enjoyed getting our pets castrated and giggles about it. We have never had an animal that has not lost its balls. So, what do you think? Do you understand my fetish and where I am coming from at age 53? Also, she is going through menopause. Anyone have an opinion?

Show here the reports of longer and healthy life for Eunuchs. Offer to let her manage your Testosterone therapy so she is in control. Dont be afraid to talk about your fantasy. By the way, life is great as a eunuch.

Stephaniesteve

Nice idea if she is controling his Testo level!

Sorry if I sound discouraging, but I must tell you the truth about it as I see it. Firstly, there are very few women who are regular members or guests here that I see, it is not that way because of any lack of welcoming them, they just are not interested in this website and it's discussions, after all, women don't have testicles and never have to contemplate removing the testicles they don't have. Secondly, of the women I have actually discussed the topic with, most are terribly ignorant of the subject, again, they never had testicles, never have to cope with the problems of having excessive testosterone, so they don't even bother to learn about castration, many women and even some men don't know the difference between "castration" and "circumcision" and as bad as that sounds, I am not kidding. Finally, of the women who do understand what castration is and the effect it has on men, they seem almost universally very averse to it or totally uninterested in the whole thing.

Most women I ve heard talk about castration know almost nothing about how it affects men. They only know it in terms of animals only. Older women with husbands castrated for prostate cancer just don t talk about it at all, at least not with other men. Probably to spare their men any embarrassment over it.

So, women don t seem very interested, except as a punch line to a joke or giggling about cutting some man as pure fantasy.

Most men don t discuss women s hyserectomies or menopause much either. We don t have ovaries, so its not what men care about or talk about.

All women face menopause and don t think castration is much different for men to go thru in later life. Maybe it isn t ? Tough to compare the many differences between those. Menopause can t be avoided, castration can be for some men. Some men have no choice.

I guess the biggest question is are you seeking this for her alone, or primarily for you ? Who is this for ? You or her ?

Also the most man don't know anything about castration and the effects. The only thing what all think to know is, a man cant have sex after it. *uaaaah*

Generally, I also have make the experience, it's no thing what is interesting for woman.

But, it it is your own wife and you can offer her to control your libido with it, could be interesting...

The most women don't talk or think about her hysterectomy and also medical castrated man doesn't.

I think the real known and a constructive open thinking and handle it as normal you can only find in communities like them here.

For us it isn't a great misfortune, it's the opposite... for us it is a deliverance and we from our future with it so positive as we need.

This is the very very very big difference between this groups.

If you are knowing much enough of the consequences and the TRT so give your wife this knowledge and I think, she will understand.

I never discussed it with my wife. I only told her when it was almost complete . She seems happy as it is and never comments on my lack of balls and lack of sex drive.

I once talked about my chemical castration with a female classmate I had. She was very supportive of my decision. It's completely different with husband/wife perspective, of course, but some women can be supportive.

My deceased wife told me before she passed that as long as I have a penis, women don't give a damn that I am castrated. She was right. I take testosterone and am as sexually active as any 18-year-old. My girlfriend, who is my age and has gone through menopause, says that she is spoiled. It takes her much longer to orgasm now, but she does. She says she had figured that her sex life was over, until she met me.

Thank you and everyone else for your comments and advice. As far as why or for whom I am doing it, functionally it is for her, I love sex myself. But I am driving her crazy, and she don't trust me around other women or traveling by myself anymore, and actually for good reason. It's also for me in that if she helps me to get it done the way a want, I get to live out my greatest lifelong fantasy. At this point in my life, especially with the availability of Depo Testosterone I think I can do without my balls. Even if I am as horny as ever with the injections, she will stop worrying about me having girlfriends because she is a farm girl and she understands that castrated animals lose their need for sex. In a way, I will be free because she will stop being paranoid and watching me like a hawk. Anyway, some of my motivations are altruistic but some are selfish. So I am human. Again thank you for the info.

Teachmywife (imported) wrote: Fri Dec 01, 2017 10:45 am Thank you and everyone else for your comments and advice. As far as why or for whom I am doing it, functionally it is for her, I love sex myself. But I am driving her crazy, and she don't trust me around other women or traveling by myself anymore, and actually for good reason. It's also for me in that if she helps me to get it done the way a want, I get to live out my greatest lifelong fantasy. At this point in my life, especially with the availability of Depo Testosterone I think I can do without my balls. Even if I am as horny as ever with the injections, she will stop worrying about me having girlfriends because she is a farm girl and she understands that castrated animals lose their need for sex. In a way, I will be free because she will stop being paranoid and watching me like a hawk. Anyway, some of my motivations are altruistic but some are selfish. So I am human. Again thank you for the info.

If the idea is you're losing your balls so your wife can trust you, then you decide to take testosterone after, I'd say don't do it. The effect you're going for is only achieved if you do not take testosterone after you get castrated. Otherwise, there is no point to it, unless you just really wish to have your balls cut off.

Having seen what has happened in America in the last month, I would say, don't trust any woman. You do the least little things and you are charged with harassment. This past month has really made an impression to me. People from everywhere coming out with Sexual Harassment that happened 20-30 years ago. I know where I have to stand. I ain't taking no chances. My sister in law says the same thing, "Be careful, don't trust anyone anymore." She has a point. Be careful! I think this past month gives us reason, "Why should we have a wife at all.?" And it gives more reason to become a Eunuch. Get rid of the sexual desires and the reason to touch another woman at all. I really think the world would be a lot better place if all men were castrated!

OneBallBoi (imported) wrote: Mon Dec 04, 2017 7:54 am Having seen what has happened in America in the last month, I would say, don't trust any woman. You do the least little things and you are charged with harassment. This past month has really made an impression to me. People from everywhere coming out with Sexual Harassment that happened 20-30 years ago. I know where I have to stand. I ain't taking no chances. My sister in law says the same thing, "Be careful, don't trust anyone anymore." She has a point. Be careful!

Not to hijack the thread or get too far off the topic of discussion.... But I must strongly agree with you on that point! When I consider the recent spate of sexual harassment cases, and some of the "victims" who had on the surface at least appeared to be very friendly with their harassing "predators," women who had continued to be friendly, sent "selfies" and letters and such to these "harassers" and then out of the blue claim that "thirty some odd years ago, that pervert touched my breast!" Oh MY GOD! I don't EVER want to be alone with anyone, male, female, or ambiguous, unless I have my own security cameras and audio recording of all the events. I am not (and never will be) a "high profile" sort, not a senator, not a major media mogul, but everyone who has even a meager income is a target for a law suit these days. Your sister is right, "don't trust anyone these days."

OneBallBoi (imported) wrote: Mon Dec 04, 2017 7:54 am Having seen what has happened in America in the last month, I would say, don't trust any woman. You do the least little things and you are charged with harassment. This past month has really made an impression to me. People from everywhere coming out with Sexual Harassment that happened 20-30 years ago. I know where I have to stand. I ain't taking no chances. My sister in law says the same thing, "Be careful, don't trust anyone anymore." She has a point. Be careful!

Great point. I'm losing hope for human race in general. All I can say is us humans are stupid! No, not "I think therefore I am" the only truth I know at this point is "humans are stupid!"

DeaconBlues (imported) wrote: Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:47 am Not to hijack the thread or get too far off the topic of discussion.... But I must strongly agree with you on that point! When I consider the recent spate of sexual harassment cases, and some of the "victims" who had on the surface at least appeared to be very friendly with their harassing "predators," women who had continued to be friendly, sent "selfies" and letters and such to these "harassers" and then out of the blue claim that "thirty some odd years ago, that pervert touched my breast!" Oh MY GOD! I don't EVER want to be alone with anyone, male, female, or ambiguous, unless I have my own security cameras and audio recording of all the events. I am not (and never will be) a "high profile" sort, not a senator, not a major media mogul, but everyone who has even a meager income is a target for a law suit these days. Your sister is right, "don't trust anyone these days."

Sorry but since the thread is already hijacked...

I have to strongly DISAGREE with the sentiment expressed here. None of the recent cases are "sexual harassment" -- they are sexual assault. This isn't about some construction workers whistling as a girl walks by but about guys forceably restraining, unezpectedly exposing themselves, drugging girls, coercing with implied threats to employment, and even actual rape. Calling it sexual harassment is seriously underplaying it.

While I also believe that there are women who will falsely accuse, and others who will regret what they did and change their tune, all of the cases in the news are extremely credible -- you don't have 50+ professional women come forward with consistent stories without a strong likelihood of truth to them.

If you don't understand why victims don't come forward until years later, you need to think about it harder (no pun intended). Even guys have been victimized. Imagine growing up acting and getting a chance to be in a movie and the producer calls you to dinner to give you acting advice and then he corners you in a hall and makes you watch him masturbate into a flower pot... first of all you know it is his word versus yours, secondly you know the guy is immensely rich and has all sorts of lawyers, further you know he can single-handedly ruin all your dreams, and lastly you know there are people who will question whether you were somehow leading him on... It is entirely normal and fully expected that most sexual assault victims don't come forward until decades later. I personally don't understand it because I'm never victimized, frankly if a guy did that to me he'd literally be dead on the spot (I hate predators of all kinds, don't think they have the right to live); however I understand that I have a lot of power (I'm physically intimidating, quite wealthy, and very good at getting my way) whereas there are lots of people who are meek, poor, physically small, etc. who simply don't have the wherewithal to stand up for themselves.

Geraldo made a lame comment about "criminalizing courtship" and you guys are hinting that you're at risk of your intentions being mis-interpreted but honestly the things these guys did (and by the way they've mostly admitted it) is not even remotely connected to "courtship". Have you ever worked in an office where a senior member (no pun intended) might be fully naked when you walked in? Charlie Rose admits this (claims he had to change in his office or some BS). Have you ever worked in an office where the guy was masturbating under the table during meetings?

I have several women who work for me, and I of course take care to never spend time alone with them that isn't on camera. I'm not stupid to think that false claims can't happen.

But please do not lump in these serial sexual predators with the guys that might tell a crude joke after a couple drinks at an office path. These situations are not even close.

And again, most of these guys have admitted it. Trump is on record with his own voice talking about being a peeping Tom at Miss Universe pageants, kissing women without asking, and grabbing girls UNEXPECTEDLY by the p*ssy; CK Lous admitted it. Spacey admitted it. Charlie Rose admitted it. Weinstein sort of admitted it. Lauer admitted it. This ain't no case of false accusations.

We all know that guys are/can be perverts. Heck half the guys here want castration to free themselves from their urges. We all know that some fetishes are predatory -- I'm glad that mine are related to self-harm but if I had the same compulsions to expose myself or force myself on others then I know I would be a real danger. The force of these sexual compulsions is super strong and you know that some number of guys given enough wealth and power are going to act out.

A lot of what you say is true. One big problem is how everything is lumped together under sexual harrassment including rape, assault, exposure, and many criminal acts. Then mere annoyances are added under the same labels, such as harmless jokes, harmless comments, mere looks, whistles, and tons of non criminal human behaviors.

The intent seems to be to use actual criminal acts to falsely label harmless and minor annoyances as being criminal, which they clearly aren t. The agenda is to try to criminalize any unwanted sexual or romantic attempts that are not welcomed by the victims. The victims arbitrarily decide whose attention is welcomed and all others can be accused of a crime for exactly the same attentions if unwelcomed. A lot of this is to control males of all ages by threats, shame, and exaggeration of normal male sexual interests.

cutnbulls2ox (imported) wrote: Tue Dec 05, 2017 5:36 pm The intent seems to be to use actual criminal acts to falsely label harmless and minor annoyances as being criminal, which they clearly aren t. The agenda is to try to criminalize any unwanted sexual or romantic attempts that are not welcomed by the victims. The victims arbitrarily decide whose attention is welcomed and all others can be accused of a crime for exactly the same attentions if unwelcomed. A lot of this is to control males of all ages by threats, shame, and exaggeration of normal male sexual interests.

Agree absolutely!!

Dude, don't let your wife tell you what to do with your balls. They are yours and yours alone and if she wants them gone because she doesn't want sex she is a bad person and you would probably be better off without her, because if she can't accept you for you, she shouldn't be with you trying to change who you are into who she wants you to be.

cutnbulls2ox (imported) wrote: Tue Dec 05, 2017 5:36 pm A lot of what you say is true. One big problem is how everything is lumped together under sexual harrassment including rape, assault, exposure, and many criminal acts. Then mere annoyances are added under the same labels, such as harmless jokes, harmless comments, mere looks, whistles, and tons of non criminal human behaviors.

The intent seems to be to use actual criminal acts to falsely label harmless and minor annoyances as being criminal, which they clearly aren t. The agenda is to try to criminalize any unwanted sexual or romantic attempts that are not welcomed by the victims. The victims arbitrarily decide whose attention is welcomed and all others can be accused of a crime for exactly the same attentions if unwelcomed. A lot of this is to control males of all ages by threats, shame, and exaggeration of normal male sexual interests.

I definitely agree that it is a mis-characterization to lump these all together.

However, I don't agree that this is part of some evil scheme/agenda. There is no agenda in news except to make as much money as possible -- they are corporate entities. All the talk show hosts and other talking heads are just actors (or maybe more like professional wrestlers). Guys like Bill O'Reilly don't believe most of the stuff they say. There isn't any "liberal" or "conservative" media, there is just some media outlets that know they can make money with click bait that attracts liberal people and other media knows they can make money with click bait that attracts conservative people. Don't think that means that these organizations care about any of those ideas. That is why there are actual fake news outlets now too -- as long as you make someone click on your article you've achieved your agenda (to make money).

There is also no women's agenda. The only thing the women in theses cases have to gain is to hopefully make other weirdo guys think twice before forcing people to watch them masturbate.

There is no need to fear women like you do. Women don't have and never have had any significant power, and I am not aware of any woman ever that is dangerous in the way you're worried about. There are some mentally ill women who can cause physical harm, and there are some gold-diggers who may make opportunistic false claims, I don't doubt that. But the idea that there is a concerted strategy by women in general is absurd. If you don't believe me just eaves-drop on what women talk about when they are together -- it is not at all related to coming up with an agenda to dominate men.

Men are the real thing to fear -- they are the dangerous ones on the street, in the boardroom and in the bedroom. I actually like that because I like the competition!

Even dominatrixes (and I've got a decades of experience in the femdom world) are fake -- they only have power over men because men let them have that power. And the occasional sadistic domme is usually one who is acting out due to the fact that men have domineered them all their life, basically they are emotionally damaged by men. You can tell they are fake because they need all that protocol, play-acting and costumes. In contrast, as men we can saunter into any room or situation and simply take control naturally without any rigamarole. There are no women in any positions of real power in the world, and those that might seem to be are usually just props for an organization to look progressive. The vast majority of women spend their time cooking, doing laundry and sucking cock to keep men happy.

If you're worrying about flirting being mistaken for harassment simply stop mixing work and pleasure. Whenever you have power over someone, simply don't flirt. There are so many women out there that there is no need to flirt with your personal assistant, student, or co-worker. Just keep it in your pants (literally!) in professional situations.

Overall, I think all this fear about women is just paranoia. In fact these cases in the news should make you LESS afraid of being accused of harassment. If you think about it, these guys were serial sexual predators and only years later did the women get confidence to bring it up and only due to the sheer numbers of accusers are they being considered. Basically, apparently you can get away with a lot more than I ever thought possible.

Congratulations, SD. You have come thru all your personal things over the years to be a fair and balanced observer of the human scene.

I agree with some of what you say SplitDik. But I disagree on women s power and motives. Just look at any school system and how many female teachers are in control of young males all the way through 16 years of education. Lots of bosses and clients are females over males. Most marriages nowdays the women make most of the decisions for the men. Dating same thing. Even more so in dating. In reproduction its solely the women s body and women s choice by law to choose to bear any children. That law alone gets a lot of men to cave in to female dominance just to have any kids at all. And divorces give totally unbalanced rights and rewards to females, especially the custody of male children denied to the men. Talk about female dominance of male children and its totally out of proportion to male rights and contact with children, even their own children.

If there is no female agenda, then why do females clearly enjoy so many unequal perks and legal rights compared to men. And why the big push to try to control all men s and boy s behaviors through school forced male ridilin consumption and endless politically correct laws and arbitrary social rules that disadvantage all males to female advantage. If its not females pushing these, its sure not the males pushing it on themselves in numerous examples, like divorce courts and alimony and palimony payments.

Things don t just happen in patterns by themselves.

News organizations and commercial sponsors will intentionally accept lower viewership to forward obviously biased agendas that lower profits. So money that is obvious on the surface is not the only money being received or the sole agenda of the press or many non profits who alienate donors with extreme views and stances.

There is competition and friction between the sexes, no doubt that its out there and it happens a lot. Too bad that is the reality. It sure fouls up glorius sex.

Very often I accept the arguments and opinion of Splitdick. But here and now I would underline the arguments of cutnballs2ox.

Male power or dominance is so often a fairy tale, there are only few exceptions in history and present time.

Of course women have power using their (very often) poor or simply pretended sexuality and the sexuality of men. Women are perfect in manipulating men, starting shitstorms of political correctness and neverending articles of male rapes. I have the impression that male sexuality is generally bad, is not allowed and must be banned. In a certain sense castration of men will be a method to abolish the ruling power of females over males. If there is no male interest in sexual intercourse women may realize after several years that there is no reproduction of humans, specially of females.

And there is another point: women have always used their pretended sexuality to earn (better squeeze out) money; a "natural prostitution".

It s really great being able to have a good natured and friendly debate on here about what few people will openly and honestly discuss ! Men and women and if and how they get along and interact.

If cloning is available, it would permanently change the interactions and power balance between the sexes. Men would not have to give in to women to have kids. Marriage and raising kids as single men would change dramtically. Hopefully, empty marriages and just barely legal prostitution would be greatly reduced in frequency.

I think the real root attraction and joy of much of gay sex is two or more men freely enjoying sex as equals and for mutual pleasure with no guilt or shame or embarrassment and ideally free of hidden agendas. Just a fun roll in the sack for pure pleasure. Men love sex for sex itself. No romance or commitment is extracted to get your kicks. No monet is spent. No date required. Just 2 men enjoying pure sex fun ! No strings, no hassles, no games. Just suck n fuck each other for pleasure and admit what turns you on. He ll probably get off on the same things as you. Men understand how men think and feel and lust. Men understand other men s wants and bodies better than any woman ever can. Less worry of being accused of rape if all the dicks are erect and shooting loads too ! Then its just stay away from the under aged jail bait and you re good to go and enjoy sex to the max !

To me the interesting point is that two people can look at life and see two completely different things. Like politics. I agree more with SD and Gerslave agrees more with you. It would to me be interesting to know people's life trajectory. The statement that if you want to make a feminist, give a man a daughter, applies to me. I can remember pre-two decades marriage and daughter when I maybe would have agreed more. But that is just me.