I am 16, my name is Kole, I am from Pennsylvania, and I have been interested in political science for awhile now, but before entering my political science phase about a year ago, I have always been interested in medicine, I went from wanting to be an oncologist, to a palliative care physician, and then to a neuro-oncologist, if you are familiar with those medical specialties or know anything about them, then you could see I take a liking to the more taboo fields, oncology deals with cancer which is a common fear amongst western society, palliative care is also known as end of life care which is another topic too feared to discuses around the dinner table in the west, so obviously, when I shifted into the political science phase of my life, I naturally was attracted to the more medical side of politics, and in today's age that would be transgenderism, transgenderism has become a huge debate in the political and medical world, while I have my opinions on the debate that I have gotten from studies like the popular "Long-Term Follow-Up of Transsexual Persons Undergoing Sex Reassignment Surgery" that is besides the point and not what I am here to discuss today, today I am here to discuss that during my medical-political research into transgenderism with WPATH and their standards of care version 8, I have came across a chapter, a chapter that would change my life and send me down a rabbit hole that would show me the whole spectrum of human behavior, show me humanity, make me realize that as you walk down the street people all around you have fantasies, they are battling inner thoughts that go against the social norm, their own deviances, that chapter is called eunuch, the eunuch chapter I do not believe I need to explain, I am sure all of you are very familiar with it, I say it showed me humanity and the full spectrum of human behavior due to the websites and people it has put me in contact with, The whole reason why I am on here, and on many other websites undercover at 16 is because how niche, and odd this community is, how abnormal it is, it fits perfectly in with my other taboo interests and I believe saying that I talked to hundreds of eunuchs personally and called surgeons like Dr. Marc Arnkoff personally would have given me a GREAT amount of reputability and experience or even respect, which I believe it has, I believe obviously after admitting that I am 16 I am going to get banned, or maybe not, we will see, but I wanted to thank everyone for participating in my research even though the moderation team tried to silence me, it has helped me gain a great deal of knowledge on this topic, on top of the many books I have obtained on this topic, one last critique is that for such a niche community that hates researchers trying to paint them in a bad light, I believe that moderation team paints themselves in a bad light, not the community, but the moderation team. They have made one of the least welcoming environments for me, I have been banned, my private messaged have been copied and sent to professors without my knowledge or consent and I have been targeted and called wrong on my limited amount of posts on this website, WheelyFixed is among the worst on this very poor inferior moderation team, but I do not want to go on and on about the many many things WheelyFixed can fix and should improve on, I sign off, probably never to sign on again due to the banning of my account with one last thanks, and a call for a new moderations team, and to be more open to researchers so you all have a chance to be no longer perceived as a social and sexual pariah, my research is done, thank you,

- Kole L.

The moderation team wasn't trying to "silence" you. You were behaving inappropriately and you were being shown the door.

Maybe let that be the lesson from your brief time here. No group owes you your own participation in that group.

Also, nobody really cares about your "one last critique" or your call for a new moderations team. You're not part of this community. From this community's perspective, the moderation team did exactly what it was supposed to.

And you're not a "researcher." You're a teenager getting off on people you think are exotic or abnormal. You fetishize people, not research them.

At least be honest with yourself, if you're not going to be honest with anybody else.

First of all, Puck, I am very honest with myself, more honest than you are with yourself, most likely, and I do not "get off" on exotic people, don't humble yourself or the eunuch community, the eunuchs are by far not the most exotic people I have spoken to or did research into, puck. What I did was not fetishize people like you claim; what I did is what we call in the West, research. I tried to understand how and why vulnerable people can get a castration or penectomy by surgeons inside the United States of America who are board-certified and respected. YOU and I both KNOW the general population thinks that it is concerning that respected surgeons in the US are operating on people who want their penis or testicles gone, and if they do not find it concerning, they at least find it interesting like myself, so that's why I'm on here, cause that is interesting and has I'd say major importance in psychiatry and medicine, and dare I say politics, and to touch briefly on what you said about silencing, I WAS, I was using the PRIVATE message function to do... could ya guess? PRIVATE MESSAGE, then allll of my private messages were copied and sent to a person I do not know, do not wish to know, and did not want my PRIVATE messages to be sent to. WheelyFixed is a nuisance, a liability, I believe WheelFixed is a sign, a sign that shows whatever it takes to become a part of the moderation team should be questioned, changed, or the standards should be risen dramatically, he has browbeaten me into not posting cause he is always replying to my post claiming my research results are wrong when I am NOT, everything I say is anecdotal, if you have a problem with the anecdotes, then have a problem with the roughly 160 eunuchs I have spoken to abroad, I deeply believe that WheelyFixed has a vendetta against me, I quite literally was silence, i was banned, puck, that is as silences as silenced gets

Paul-Sapir wrote: Tue Dec 16, 2025 10:41 pm I tried to understand how and why vulnerable people can get a castration or penectomy by surgeons inside the United States of America who are board-certified and respected. YOU and I both KNOW the general population thinks that it is concerning that respected surgeons in the US are operating on people who want their penis or testicles gone

Oh, so you're a garden variety transphobe.

"Vulnerable" (???) people can get a castration or penectomy in the United States after a lengthy process in which they and their care team reach an agreement that such procedures are appropriate and necessary for their health and that the change will be safely and carefully managed. Those surgeons are board-certifed and respected because they are providing essential health care. You, no matter how much "research" you have done, do not know better than the medical professionals who are providing gender affirming care. Nobody is being victimized, so I don't know why you're talking about people being "vulnerable," but, uh, we don't need your concern, thanks.

And I don't give a damn what the general population thinks.

I'm honestly in awe of the levels of hubris necessary to join a community for gender non-confirming people, a community people are only likely to arrive at after a lengthy period of self-reflection and self-discovery, a community that you have to literally lie about yourself in order to join, and then tell the people there "I am very honest with myself, more honest than you are with yourself, most likely." Oh, to be young...

I thought minors weren't allowed in here.

puck_ wrote: Tue Dec 16, 2025 11:10 pm

Paul-Sapir wrote: Tue Dec 16, 2025 10:41 pm I tried to understand how and why vulnerable people can get a castration or penectomy by surgeons inside the United States of America who are board-certified and respected. YOU and I both KNOW the general population thinks that it is concerning that respected surgeons in the US are operating on people who want their penis or testicles gone

Oh, so you're a garden variety transphobe.

"Vulnerable" (???) people can get a castration or penectomy in the United States after a lengthy process in which they and their care team reach an agreement that such procedures are appropriate and necessary for their health and that the change will be safely and carefully managed. Those surgeons are board-certifed and respected because they are providing essential health care. You, no matter how much "research" you have done, do not know better than the medical professionals who are providing gender affirming care. Nobody is being victimized, so I don't know why you're talking about people being "vulnerable," but, uh, we don't need your concern, thanks.

And I don't give a damn what the general population thinks.

I'm honestly in awe of the levels of hubris necessary to join a community for gender non-confirming people, a community people are only likely to arrive at after a lengthy period of self-reflection and self-discovery, a community that you have to literally lie about yourself in order to join, and then tell the people there "I am very honest with myself, more honest than you are with yourself, most likely." Oh, to be young...

I am not a transphobe; the definition of a phobia is defined by an irrational, unrealistic, persistent, and excessive fear. I do not have any of those; I simply believe that there is a deficit of evidence that supports gender medicine or gender affirming care for adolescents or children like myself, as I said, that is besides the point, and not what I would like or am here to discuss, and yes, I said vulnerable, vulnerable people are people that are more likely to be harmed, neglected or exploited due to their age, health, or economic status, that health part includes mental health, wanting to have your penis or testicles removed is mental health related if you like it or not, removing a healthy body part, or making it unhealthy to justify the removal is a mental health issue, and I have spoken to many people that are willing to self-castrate, go to veterinarians, paramedics, off-duty nurses, and many more illegal and unsafe outlets, this is BAD, if the majority, not all, but the majority are willing to get these operations under the table and illegal and risk hurting or even killing themselves, that classifies them as vulnerable if you like it or not, and if you deny this, you would just be wrong. I also did not need to lie to join this community, I simply joined under an email without my real name cause I wanted to test the waters, MY NAME IS KOLE, I am totally fine with everyone knowing me, I will give you my phone number if you want it, I honestly do not care, and I do not find that hubris in any way, and I really do not know how much more honest with myself I can be... And yes, you keep bringing it up, I am young... I personally do not believe that has anything to do with it. Maybe you bring up my age cause it arouses you or most of the other eunuchs. In fact, a large number of eunuchs in chatrooms get aroused at the thought of the young eunuchs of imperial China and the Ottoman empire being castrated, oh yes, it is true, a lot of eunuch people on the chatroom that is affiliated with eunuchworld.co website said that they get aroused and "turned on" by the thought of young people being castrated, and even asked me while chatting with them to describe how, and where they did it, I am not going to start speculating about your own perverted sexual desires, I mean, beside the one of you removing your own penis, that aside, My age has nothing to do with it, I am not a transphobe, and the majority of modern-day eunuchs are indisputably vulnerable.

Friotler7 wrote: Wed Dec 17, 2025 12:22 am I thought minors weren't allowed in here.

well... ya boi is here

Paul-Sapir wrote: Wed Dec 17, 2025 7:12 am I am not a transphobe; the definition of a phobia is defined by an irrational, unrealistic, persistent, and excessive fear. I do not have any of those

phobia, n: an extreme or irrational fear of or aversion to something.

You apparently are so averse to people receiving gender-affirming care from licensed physicians that you think your personal ick of it overrules those people's bodily autonomy. I think that's a pretty clear level of an extreme aversion; certainly an irrational one, as — again — nobody is being victimized by receiving gender-affirming care under the direction of a trained medical professional.

Paul-Sapir wrote: Wed Dec 17, 2025 7:12 amAnd yes, you keep bringing it up, I am young... I personally do not believe that has anything to do with it.

Of course you don't, that's what immaturity is. Not knowing what you don't know yet. Not understanding that the world is more complicated than you thought in childhood.

And I bring it up mainly because it's an example of you misrepresenting who you are, while prying for personal information from others, and you still think that somehow you're the good guy in all this and the only reason you could be banned is because a mod has a "vendetta" against you. You presented yourself as a sort of academic and said you "have a background in biology, sociology, and public health." You don't have a background in anything!

Paul-Sapir wrote: Wed Dec 17, 2025 7:12 amMaybe you bring up my age cause it arouses you or most of the other eunuchs.

Jesus christ.

Paul-Sapir wrote: Wed Dec 17, 2025 7:12 amI am not going to start speculating about your own perverted sexual desires [...] I am not a transphobe

Ending on "I am not a transphobe" after calling everyone mentally ill perverts and pedophiles is some truly dizzying cognitive dissonance.

While I am the most visible person here as a moderator, I do not operate in a vacuum, before banning, there was a lot of discussion behind the scenes about Paul-Sapir / Kole and how to deal with his actions. I sent copies of the PM's he sent me to other members of the team, and the decision was made by the group to ban him.

He appealed our decision, and we decided to allow him back onto the forum on probation, with the understanding that we would be watching closely for inappropriate behavior, and banning him again if he abused our trust again.

I also sent a copy of his message to a member who is not a moderator, but IS a highly respected leader in the field (We would not have had our chapter in the SOCv8 without him). I did this only because Kole claimed to be a 'researcher' and I wanted to see if he had any legitimate bona-fides. I also told Kole that I had done so, AND suggested that he look at the many papers that he has written and had published in major journals.

I believe that Kole is correct in that he is about to be banned, permanently this time, I've sent messages to the rest of the team, and as soon as I've posted this will be putting him on temporary ban pending a consensus from the rest of us.

This is because of his AGE - not necessarily his opinions, distasteful as I may find them....

WheelyFixed

Ya... a ban is probably the appropriate choice considering this site is expressly 18+.