Page 1 of 1

Uretha relocation

Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 11:49 pm
by syndrome2 (imported)
Hello,

does anyone of you know or has experience with uretha relocation? Are there several ways? Recently, I've heard of a pubic relocation i.e. that the guy nows pees and cums through a hole above his cock....

Re: Uretha relocation

Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 8:41 pm
by mickeyh3 (imported)
There have been a few pictures of a "suprapubic" cut, but that has generally been to relieve a damaged urethra when a dick has been cut off, and insfficient care take to keep the urethra open. The suprapubic incision puts a tube straight into the bladder. Not sure where the cumming goes, though. Not that route anyway.

Re: Uretha relocation

Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:44 am
by twaddler (imported)
Hello,
syndrome2 (imported) wrote: Tue Feb 27, 2007 11:49 pm does anyone of you know or has experience with uretha relocation? Are there several ways? Recently, I've heard of a pubic relocation i.e. that the guy nows pees and cums through a hole above his cock....

Now that would be something to see, ejaculating through a hole above your penis. Kind of like one of those trick flowers that you place on your lapels -- here, sniff my flower. Someone is giving you a blowjob and all of a sudden gets blasted in forehead.. lol.. I'd really like to hear more info about this, I hadn't heard about that before.

Re: Uretha relocation

Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 3:12 am
by tugon (imported)
twaddler (imported) wrote: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:44 am Now that would be something to see, ejaculating through a hole above your penis. Kind of like one of those trick flowers that you place on your lapels -- here, sniff my flower. Someone is giving you a blowjob and all of a sudden gets blasted in forehead.. lol.. I'd really like to hear more info about this, I hadn't heard about that before.

Be careful, you might end up cockeyed.

Re: Uretha relocation

Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:11 pm
by Monsternips (imported)
A urethral reroute is usually located behind the scrotal sac in the perianal area. The only above the penis reroute I know of is called a superincision in which the penis is split from the top, a very unusual and dangerous operation because of the nerves and blood supplies involved. I hope the info helps- Monsternips

Re: Uretha relocation

Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 6:10 pm
by syndrome2 (imported)
Many thx for yr answers so long.... have to contact the guy to get more information from himself....

Re: Uretha relocation

Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 11:37 pm
by Paolo
I know a fellow with a suprapubic catheter installed for urination. They're a real pain in the wazoo to deal with, too.

Once one of these is installed, it carries urine right out of the bladder and down the catheter, exiting the body right above the penis's base or point of attachment. As I do not understand the procedure for installation, I don't know if it is put right INTO the bladder or if it is connected to the urethra below the prostate. If the latter, then ejaculate material would come out the catheter as well as urine. I am assuming that is not installed below the prostate, connecting to the urethra there.

Perhaps Talula can comment further, as he knows a lot about this kind of stuff?

Re: Uretha relocation

Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 12:57 am
by syndrome2 (imported)
hi paolo,

that sounds like the stuff the guy has....

Re: Uretha relocation

Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 2:01 am
by tugon (imported)
A suprapubic catheter is inserted directly into the bladder. Having assisted a urologist in inserting the catheters I hope to never have one. He usually used them when the urethra was blocked and he was unable to insert a Foley catheter. He would anesthetize the skin and then use a device that would punch through the abdominal wall into the bladder. He said as soon as the skin was numb there were no pain in the insertion other than the pressure on the usually full bladder. Later if he could remove adhesions or repair the urethra the suprapubic could be removed.

Re: Uretha relocation

Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 2:56 am
by satanherself (imported)
Have seen 2 done without a catheter,I belive the issue that comes up most often is muscle control so your not just peeing without warning.

Re: Uretha relocation

Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 4:41 am
by jemagirl (imported)
I'm pretty sure if any thing is going directly into the bladder and bypassing the bladder's sphincter, then diapers would be required, unless some other means such as an external valve were used on the catheter. I tried to find a good diagram on the internet to show what I am talking about. Perhaps some one else can post a link.

In any case an procedure such as this would not be for the faint of hart.

Jema

Re: Uretha relocation

Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 5:44 am
by satanherself (imported)
Heres a better idea of what I ment.It is very graphic so

http://wiki.bmezine.com/index.php/Urethral_Reroute

Re: Uretha relocation

Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 4:42 pm
by numnuts (imported)
A lot of older people have their urethras relocated to Florida. But it's just too humid there for most people.

Re: Uretha relocation

Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 11:23 pm
by kristoff
numnuts (imported) wrote: Thu Mar 22, 2007 4:42 pm A lot of older people have their urethras relocated to Florida. But it's just too humid there for most people.

And hot as well

Re: Uretha relocation

Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 11:28 pm
by A-1 (imported)
Hello,
syndrome2 (imported) wrote: Tue Feb 27, 2007 11:49 pm does anyone of you know or has experience with uretha relocation? Are there several ways? Recently, I've heard of a pubic relocation i.e. that the guy nows pees and cums through a hole above his cock....

If the original urethra is blocked, the ejaculate goes retrograde into the urinary bladder. The ejaculate product is then excreted with the urine.

Translation. YOUR come goes into your bladder and it comes out of the body when you pee.

A suprapubic catheter is usually an extremely small gauge and only urine will pass through it. In theory, a foley catheter can be inserted with a suprapubic technique but infection is usually, sooner or later, the result. Unlike a "G" tube or a gastric tube, the urinary tract is normally a sterile environment while the Gastro-Intestinal system is not. So, "G" tubes can be easily healed without infections. The longer the route from the urinary tract to the outside of the body, the less the infection rate of the sterile urinary tract. O.K.?

Loop illeostomies are usually used when cancer (or serious trauma) necessitates the removal of the bladder and or ureters. However, as posted above, if there is no muscle controlled spincter, the urine drips out as it is secreted and must be caught in a bag, an osteomy bag.

All sorts of surgical techniques have been done in the past and if you are interested, seek a medical school library and look at specialty urology textbooks. However, misery is usually the end result.

These techniques are generally used to buy time for terminal cancer patients and are used on severe injuries to keep people alive. Because of their gruesomeness, they are not seen often.

If you are getting a fixation on this you need to really consider talking to a professional. If is it just a fantasy, well, just don't get carried away, O.K.?

Re: Uretha relocation

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 2:02 am
by satanherself (imported)
Well with GRS they relocate don't they?

Re: Uretha relocation

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 3:47 pm
by A-1 (imported)
They locate with GPS...

Re: Uretha relocation

Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 3:04 pm
by Detach (imported)
I have personal experience with urethral relocation. Mine was relocated behind the scrotum. It wasn't for health reasons, it was for my own personal reasons. I had to undergo 12 operations for it and may end up with a 13th to widen the hole, but otherwise, I'm very happy with it.

Re: Uretha relocation

Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 5:21 am
by Dazed (imported)
i would really like to get a urethra relocation, does anyone know how i can either do this myself of know of anywhere i can get this?

thanks,