EA Forums

Actually, it is both illegal and also unethical according to physician ethics code. In order to be legal and ethical, amputating healthy organs from a person requires at least some agreed medical condition diagnosis (e.g. transgender) for which the standard practice needs to be the amputation ...

Those two things are like opposites.

I'm sorry that you feel that. The 19th century's effects on religion really betrayed you.


God is still #1 in my life. My life is so much more relaxed now.



Well, that's good, at least.

words

Or, dropping the excluded middle fallacy, you could have found ...

What if the patient is un-married? And does the prescreening just weed out people who are actually messed up in the head, or does it require a valid medical reason for the castration?

Of course we all know were the blame is, religion as a whole or in part by the many factions fighting to have there view of the world be the only view.



If you think religion is to blame for sexual puritanism, you need to read up on 19th century "medicine," which is responsible for most ...