Tribes? Posting eunuch pics

[Hash (imported)]

Tried to upload some pictures to "tribes.net" and they wouldn't let me stating that nothing pornographic was/is allowed, but I noticed several other eunuchs, modified men, with pictures on "tribes." Advice?

[moi621 (imported)]

I have uploaded images to the Tribes penectomy group with no problems.

That was some time ago. Has the definition of penectomy changed?

[Hash (imported)]

I don't know, I tried several times to post with no luck. From my persistent trials it might be even more difficult for me to post. I did post some pics to malebodymods and hopefully they'll be up or viewable in a few days.

[nuderthannude (imported)]

I post photos to the tribe all the time. Try posting them to the penectomy tribe.

[gandalf (imported)]

Also, watch the size of the photo. Cannot exceed 1 mb. I tried to up load a couple of mine and they did not go. I found out they were larger than would be accepted. So, I just redid them an uploaded them o.k.

[paring (imported)]

On what Tribe did you try?

[nullorchis (imported)]

I'm presuming you have an account. (free). Some tribes are not open and require membership before you can add anything; posts, photos, etc.

It is kind of odd that tribes claims that posts must be squeaky clean, yet permit such open display of the human body.

There must be limits. And anyone can post a complaint on any post. I guess the tribe moderator reviews those, or perhaps tribe.com reviews complaints, I don't know.

xtube.com as you and most here already know, is another option.

[Losethem (imported)]

Yes, people should edit their photos for size instead of simply posting them directly out of the camera. Not only are the file sizes more internet friendly, it also allows you to claim the original unmodified file should someone steal your work and download your photo and claim it is theirs.

Nothing like being able to go to a site and say, "Hey, this bozo downloaded my photo and is reposting without permission..." and being able to at least prove you had it first by file size. If they are only able to produce a photo in the 40-50kb range and you can produce the photo over 1MB, that other person is going to look foolish.

We limit the size of photos on the site I moderate for specifically this reason. Well, that and we archive everything so if the site goes KA-BOOM! we have a way to restore it.

--LT

[Hash (imported)]

I did resize my photos, but I'll try again.

[Losethem (imported)]

I did resize my photos, but I'll try again.

Your stuff did show up when I had a chance to moderate it. What would be helpful is renaming the photo instead of sending us the file with the name it came out of the camera with.

The reason moderation took longer this weekend is that this was the first full weekend I've had off from my job since last June so I decided to get out of town with people I've not been able to do stuff with for awhile. Or put another way, the site ceased being important for a couple days because I needed me time.

I'm back now.

--LT

[nullorchis (imported)]

re: "

Yes, people should edit their photos for size instead of simply posting them directly out of the camera.

"

Thus we are reminded: SIZE MATTERS. The smaller the better. !!!

[Losethem (imported)]

Holding the file sizes down also helps people who might view the site on a mobile device (Smarthphone, iPad, etc.) since they generally use phone networks and those are slow compared to what we use on computers.

--LT