Penis or Balls?

[LuckyStrike (imported)]

This is directed more towards those that are just curious about castration/penectomy (or solely fantasize!) but I was curious, if you were forced to choose between a penectomy or full castration, which would you choose and why? I direct this towards those that are only curious, as those of us who find a sexual thrill in or are truly seeking castration/penectomy would have differing reasons for choosing the way we would. So, if a guy who didn't really want to lose any parts was forced to choose, I have to wonder which would he rather live without. Thanks for indulging me!

[romuluso (imported)]

I would like to lose my one remaining testicle and enjoy having an empty sack for a while and then eventually have my scrotum removed. At some point, I might also want the head of my penis stumped.

[nuderthannude (imported)]

My penis, as I'm sure that I can still find ways of achieving orgasm without it. (would like the smoother crotch without any bulge when I get turned on by an attractive female) But I don't want to lose my balls and loose my sexual desire nor do I want to have to go the "T" replacement route.

[spadones (imported)]

I suppose I would want to keep my cock as it is a handy tool for pissing. If it weren't for that, I'd want to do the full job and go smooth.

[Hash (imported)]

Sounds like the making of a new "Saw" movie. I can hear the plot, "One of you must lose his penis and one of you must lose his testicles, the four of you must choose between you, if you don't castrate one and remove the penis of another, you will all die."

[Dave (imported)]

Sounds like the making of a new "Saw" movie. I can hear the plot, "One of you must lose his penis and one of you must lose his testicles, the four of you must choose between you, if you don't castrate one and remove the penis of another, you will all die."

I might have enjoyed the SAW movies after #1 if that was the premise.

[Mac (imported)]

This is directed more towards those that are just curious about castration/penectomy (or solely fantasize!) but I was curious, if you were forced to choose between a penectomy or full castration, which would you choose and why? I direct this towards those that are only curious, as those of us who find a sexual thrill in or are truly seeking castration/penectomy would have differing reasons for choosing the way we would. So, if a guy who didn't really want to lose any parts was forced to choose, I have to wonder which would he rather live without. Thanks for indulging me!

I would definately not want balls without the penis as that would be an inconvenience, a source of frustration and rather unsightly appearance for me.

I might be able to partially tollerate a penis without balls but it would not be any more than a limp and useless piece of flesh to be used for peeing. Why not just have a pee hole low enough so that you could conveniently sit to pee in comfort?

Given the choice I would elect total removal with urethra relocation. The only unique function of the penis is sexual penetration of another. It is not necessary for urination. So if not for sex, why have it?

:dong:

[nvrgag44 (imported)]

I'm still fully intact but if my prostate cancer came back and castration was an option I'd choose it rather than go back on Lupron. I would also insist on scrotum removal by a real pro even if I had to pay for it myself. I've had the opportunity to play with a castrated guy and I love fondling and sucking his empty scrotum but I've also seen numerous pictures of guys with no scrotum. When the surgery was done properly it was absolutely beautiful, IMHO. There was only a penis and a perfectly scarless and smooth pelvic area below it, just like it was always that way. Perfect.

[thewave22 (imported)]

A bit of a combo breaker, but i prefer a partial penectomy, may it be just the head, or just leave a little stump.

for frustration and humiliation.

[stewie69 (imported)]

Penis. I've thought about cutting it off since I was a kid. Those thoughts still cross my mind, even though I really enjoy using the thing. I'd have my penis cut off, and if the frustration got unbearable, then the balls would go, too.

[Woggler58 (imported)]

This very question was asked among about 20 Boy Scouts age 12-15 while we were all taking a washrag bath one afternoon among the bushes at a High Sierra lake in 1956. No adults were present. Some of us were pre-puberty as I was at age 13, others post-puberty as their pubic hair revealed. It was the first open mention of castration or penectomy I'd ever heard and it came as a memorable surprise. Nobody showed any arousal from considering the question. Our consensus was to lose our balls on grounds they were useless without a penis, but by keeping the penis at least we could pee standing up, unlike how girls do it. Nobody favored losing their penis. Next day we hiked into Kings Canyon Nat'l Park from the east via Bishop Pass.

Decades later, the idea of losing my balls increasingly became intriguing and loaded with erotic significance. I'm in nvrgag44's situation as to prostate cancer; if mine came back I'd go with losing my balls as the androgen suppression alternative. Probably I'd have to accept having an empty scrotum and consider whether to keep it or eliminate it once I was T-free.

[Peter47-NL (imported)]

This choice is easy: a full castration for me!

It took me years to understand why the antic sculptures on the Homepage of the Eunuch Archive had balls and no penis. Eunuchs with balls? Oh,

of course there are also people who want to have their penis cut!

[feedback (imported)]

This choice is easy: a full castration for me!

Both for me.

[lafargew (imported)]

My penis is little and puny and barely functional. It is what i'd choose to lose, plus would like to keep the balls at least for the time being rather than having to go on HRT. The humiliation of being shown off with a dickless crotch is a turn-on.

[Onenutleft (imported)]

I'd go with having my last remaining nut removed. Sure I'd be sterile then, but I could still function as a male if I chose to.

[Thursday (imported)]

For me, the fantasy would be to either lose just the penis or the whole lot.

Penectomy alone turns me on because of the sexual frustration factor; the concept of being sexually teased without any hope of release (except, maybe, being penetrated by someone else) gets me really interested. If I couldn't keep the testicles, though, I'd go for a full nullification to enjoy the smooth look and feminine feel.

Ah, fantasies...

[kenphill (imported)]

I would say both. If you don't have one, what do you need the other for? The dong would be just in the way. In this case, it's a fact that, less is more.

[Onenutleft (imported)]

Well I disagree there.

My penis could still be useful for sex once I was on hormone replacement. Thus I could still hopefully enjoy sex with my partner, and pleasure her as well. Even were that not possible I would still like the ability to take a leak in the woods as I do now. As an avid nature lover, I think my level of enjoyment would fall dramatically if I had to drop trou just to pee. No that little flap of skin is rather useful, and I feel rather attached to it. So I think I would keep it no matter what

[Marcello93 (imported)]

I'm a submissive person and i imagine it done to me by a top, so my eventual master should make the choice.

My fantasies concern more the cut of my nuts in any case.

[gandalf (imported)]

After being without balls for seven years and my cock shrinking about 45 percent, I would love to have it removed and the urethra relocated lower. It would feel so much better with nothing between my legs.

[Cyberius11 (imported)]

Would love to have the balls removed. Penis I would like to keep intact for pleasure from time to time.

[jetleg (imported)]

i keep the balls, my penis is already useless!

[leroywolfer (imported)]

if i had to choose i would choosemy balls

[experiment (imported)]

I don't think many read the initail question fully.

If the choice were between losing the penis or the whole package (balls and penis) I would opt for the whole package. Why have balls if you can never have a normal orgasm or masturbate and ejaculate. It sounds like a serious type of punishment. It would leave me totally frustrated.

[_g (imported)]

I don't think many read the initail question fully.

If the choice were between losing the penis or the whole package (balls and penis) I would opt for the whole package. Why have balls if you can never have a normal orgasm or masturbate and ejaculate. It sounds like a serious type of punishment. It would leave me totally frustrated.

I would have the M to F surgery a stay male to achieve what member castr8edmale has. For his photos search for him on Tribe.net

_g