It's time for a discusion about etiquette.

For castration-related posts that just don’t seem to fit anywhere else.
kristoff
Posts: 4756
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 10:45 am

Posting Rank

Re: It's time for a discusion about etiquette.

Post by kristoff »

Losethem (imported) wrote: Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:15 am I understand the difficulties of moderation myself, but when I sit back here as a user I can politely say that I've seen many threads get closed down before I've had a chance to see a single post in them.

I'm not sure if you're able to do it in this system, but where I perform the same duties, I do not outright ban someone unless they have done something so horrible that they're not going to be allowed back in ever. On MBM the theft of materials and reposting them without permission is the big one, and I can only recall banning someone over that on one occasion.

I tend to suspend accounts and send the user messages telling them what they have to do to return their account to good standing. I'm not sure if you have a system in place here to simply suspend rather than ban. I've found suspension with a note to the user generally gets their attention. For 'infractions' like Punky Pink had I usually suspend them for a day, then lift it and send them a note saying why it was in place and that they are welcome back if they cease doing whatever it was that got the account suspended. I give 'em a chance that way, and losing access for a day is usually a good enough attention getter to get them to stop the behavior without alienating them completely.

--LT

Yes, we do have such a system - it functions as a temporary ban - 1 day to permanent, and yes I have used it on occasion. Normally I don't even like to do that. Usually a PM is sufficient about 98% of the time, a few get an attention getter. Very few get banned. In the past 10 years or so, we've had about 60,000 people registered here - out of that bunch about 25-30 have been permanently banned - and even some of those I will reinstate after a few discussion points are exchanged. I only use the rolled up newspaper with Moi; he's special.

I completely concur with Paolo's action in banning Punky. Every time she comes around, she expresses as a very angry girl, who takes umbrage at just about everything, and then stomps off and pouts for a while, then comes back looking for more. She needs to tone it down - go ahead and be angry if one desires, but don't take it to the warpath. Education has done more to maintain peace than screaming and yelling.
talula
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2025 7:42 am

Posting Rank

Re: It's time for a discusion about etiquette.

Post by talula »

Probably shouldn't add my two cents to this but I will since this conversation bugs me.

I don't know of any website so accepting of folks nor staff so tolorant and users that come to the Archive would do themselves a favor to model that tolorance (most do).

Just to make it clear, if I had been the first one across Pinkys post, I would have popped her right there and then, no if's and's or but's.

People can talk about staff being heavy handed but I know these folks and I've never seen one do something without just cause. The only folks that have ever had to be afraid of staff are the ones that won't listen when warned or go out of thier way to test.

To illustrate and I do not suggest you try this: Go wave a gun around in front of a cop and see how far you get.

Even if you are in the right, he will want the first and last words and you had better let him have them. Saying that you know better, he is in the wrong and should therefore fuck off is probably not going to earn you grace. o

More on tolorance.

Sure, folks use words that others find offensive and we all hope those words will fall from use. There are words that folks use here on the Archive every day I find offensive but I choose not to scream about folks using them because first off, I have better things to do.

Yes, there are terms that if folks used would make me take action and that 'list' of terms will continue to grow, or maybe shrink. This list isn't written down, and I"m not going into what is on it.

The Archive:

The Archive is a living breathing entity that is larger then the sum of it's whole. It is more than anyone can tell and it isn't going away (though there are folks that wish it would and some of those folks are still welcome to post on the forums <- tolorance). People will come to The Archive when they need it, they will leave when they don't and there isn't much to stop that.

If you get a chance, organize or attend a MoM. Meeting folks from the Archive does wonders
OneBallBoi (imported)
Posts: 812
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 9:50 am

Posting Rank

Re: It's time for a discusion about etiquette.

Post by OneBallBoi (imported) »

Talula is right.. There is never a more accepting group that the EA.. People who understand and accept you as a Eunuch. The world and Family, just do not understand and are not accepting. We are a different group.. Pretty unique. And pretty cool.. Yep, as a Eunuch, you have to live with dry skin, paper thin finger nails and more.. But I would not trade my identity as a Eunuch for anything else.. I am accepting of me and I like it.
Slammr (imported)
Posts: 1643
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2002 5:21 am

Posting Rank

Re: It's time for a discusion about etiquette.

Post by Slammr (imported) »

I will readily ban people from my site for rude behavior toward me, one of my moderators, or toward another member. I've banned a bunch. My listed reason for the ban is, "For being a jerk."

No owner of a free site owes anything to any of his members. Most choose to play fair, but "Free Speech" doesn't apply. Punky was being a jerk and got what every jerk deserves, the boot.

I might issue a caution before banning, but once I ban someone, they are gone for good.

The chip on Punky's shoulder is so big, I would be surprised that she could walk a straight line. It must continually put her off balance.
jemagirl (imported)
Posts: 1291
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 6:02 pm

Posting Rank

Re: It's time for a discusion about etiquette.

Post by jemagirl (imported) »

talula wrote: Mon Apr 08, 2013 9:09 am Probably shouldn't add my two cents to this but I will since this conversation bugs me.

I'm sorry Talula, I didn't start this thread to criticize the EA, the Mods, or any of the members. Rather it was just to raise awareness about some of the things we do that hurt other. All I want is for people to be aware of the issue and to raise their game a bit. In that regard I think this thread has done its job.
transward (imported)
Posts: 1075
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 5:17 pm

Posting Rank

Re: It's time for a discusion about etiquette.

Post by transward (imported) »

There are several points that need to be made here. This post may be long, but I suspect I am the most qualified poster here to discuss the subject (no false modesty here). For those who haven't followed the whole discussion, here are a couple of links to the closed thread where I discuss some of the history of the term "Tranny." http://www.eunuch.org/forums/showthread ... post233690 http://www.eunuch.org/forums/showthread ... post233884 .

The transsexual sexologists' Axis of Evil, Blanchard, Bailey, and Lawrence observed that transsexuals tended to fall into one of two groups which they called Autogynephilic, and Homosexual. The theory they developed to explain it was rather preposterous, but the observation is valid. The AG (I don't want to write the whole thing every time) group were older, usually from a straight background, often married, better educated, more likely to identify as lesbian, though less sexually active. The Homosexual group were younger, sometimes teenagers, often thrown out by their family because they were gender variant and sexually active with men, thus perceived as gay. Being younger, prettier, poorer and often homeless they were much more likely to get into sex work, escorting, street prostitution and porn. Most large cities have areas where trans prostitutes can be picked up. Up till the early 2000s and the flowering of the Internet, we all hung around together, against a common oppressor, at the local gay bar, and met at trans support groups, which were the only place to get info on hormones, electrolysis and all the other fun things we go through. With the rise of the internet, that hanging together was replaced by sitting alone at a computer communicating with people you might never meet in a medium that encourages fanaticism. With the popularity of talk shows, Phil Donahue, and particularly Jerry Springer, trans people became media darlings, and they wanted the most colorful and outrageous, often sex workers. Then celebrities started getting caught with "tranny" prostitutes in large number and the term, along with she-male became associated with sex workers. These days the two groups don't socialize and seldom meet, and don't much like each other, the HS group thinks the AG group are a bunch of silly old cross-dressers sitting around playing fem, and the AG groups think the HS are homosexuals dressing as men to have sex with other men often for money. The vilification of the word "Tranny" is a part of the AG group trying to distance themselves from the HS group and their association with sex work. The HS group seldom objects to tranny or she'-male, unless accompanied with violence. That distancing is a bit ironic because, frankly, our foremothers were often whores, because until recently it was the only occupation that society would allow those few with the courage to be transsexual.

And the whole politically correct attempt to ban words smacks too much of magical thinking. The idea that calling someone a colored man is enervating and demeaning while calling him a man of color empowers and enhances him, is exactly the same as the magician believing that getting an incantation exactly right will give him power. I grew up on "Sticks and stones may break my bones but words can never harm me." while today the punishment for using the word may be many times that for an actual deed. If I hit you over the head with a baseball bat I might get a couple of years for assault and battery, while if I call you "faggot" and hit you over the head with a baseball bat I could get ten years for a hate crime, making the word five times worse than the deed. The problem with what the law calls "fighting words" is that they are used deliberately to attack and hurt. The more you succeed in making the words awful and hideous, the more power you hand to our enemies to attack us. Dick Gregory had the right idea when he titled his autobiography Nigger, saying " Dear Momma -- Wherever you are, if ever you hear the word "nigger" again, remember they are advertising my book." That is why we reclaim words, to take away their power to harm us. (though as I pointed out in the earlier post, we have been using the word all along, so it's hardly reclaiming)

I invite you to look at what Punky quoted"

If someone yells "dyke" to a lesbian they're meaning "being gay is wrong/disgusting to me". If a lesbian reclaims the word she's saying "being gay is ok so this word should not be offensive and in fact I will say it with pride".If someone calls me a "tranny" they're likely to mean "you're a man in a dress".Reclaiming the word would imply saying "yes, I am a man in a dress and I'm proud of it". At this point I might as well reclaim the word "faggot", considering that that has too been used against me.I am not proud of being a man, because I am NOT a man.Reclaiming "tranny" is not the same as reclaiming "dyke" or "queer" or other words used against cis LGB people. Those words aren't (usually) used to invalidate one's identity.It comes as no surprise that pretty much everyone who's reclaiming "tranny" is a drag queen or a cross-dresser but hardly someone who actually identifies as a different gender than what they were assigned at birth, and when they are they're usually trans men and we know that that word is disproportionately used against "trans-feminine" people. Notice the utter derision heaped on the "man in a dress." Why does this so offend her. If she really believes she is just another woman, why would a man in a dress be so offensive. Most bio-women can laugh at Flip Wilson's Geraldine, or the movie Too Wong Fu or Priscella Queen of the Desert, without taking offense. The man in a dress joke goes back at least to Classical Greece 2500 years ago. See the story of Hercules and Omphale.

In one of many Greek variations on the theme of penalty for "inadvertent" murder, for his murder of Iphitus, the great hero Heracles, whom the Romans identified as Hercules, was, by the command of the Delphic Oracle Xenoclea, remanded as a slave to Omphale for the period of a year,,...The theme, inherently a comic inversion of gender roles is not fully illustrated in any surviving text from Classical Greece. .... and to Sophocles in The Trachiniae it was shameful for Heracles to serve an Oriental woman in this fashion,[7] but there are many late Hellenistic and Roman references in texts and art to Heracles being forced to do women's work and even wear women's clothing and hold a basket of wool while Omphale and her maidens did their spinning, as Ovid tells:[8] Omphale even wore the skin of the Nemean Lion and carried Heracles' olive-wood club. Unfortunately no full early account survives, to supplement the later vase-paintings. I think this is a symptom of our dirty little secret, how transphobic many trans people are. There is a tiny minority of males, such as Andrej Pejic or Bill Kaulitz, who can fluff up their hair, change their walk and gestures slightly and pass as girls. But for the vast majority of us, going from perceived as male to perceived as female is going to go through a period where we are perceived as a man in a dress. Without a sense of humor this period is going to be painful and humiliating.(though from the evidence of some of our and Fictionmania stories, there are some who get off on the humiliation) And for a certain percentage of transwomen, their lack of physical and financial assets are going to make it impossible to pass completely. And yet many of them persist in the face of impossible odds. If you want to see real courage look at some of these people. Could you face having "Tranny fag! Freak!" hurled in your face on a daily basis? But do you see any compassion for them in Punky's post. I see only contempt, and how she links it to those lesser beings, drag queens and crossdressers who would accept a label associated with a man in a dress. This is a clear rejection of their own history. For too many of us transwomen, "I am just a normal woman with a slight, easily corrected birth defect, but all you others are weird perverts and I don't have anything to do with you" Many transwomen, aside from their expected exemption for the slight birth defect, sound just like "Focus on the Family." in their contempt for transwomen who don't meet their standards.

For those of you who run into the word used as a "fighting word" the advice I have given to trans support groups for years is this. If there are no people around or you think you are in danger, ignore them. Under no circumstances engage them in conversation. Too many trans people end up dead or in the hospital because they thought they had to confront a bigot. Righteous indignation doesn't cut it against guns or knives. But in a bar or with people around I like to smile sweetly, say "Why thank you, you say the nicest things, and you have a nice day too," turn around and walk off tossing in a Marilyn Monroe wiggle and as big a hair flip as I can pull off.

Transward
Dave (imported)
Posts: 6386
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2001 10:06 am

Posting Rank

Re: It's time for a discusion about etiquette.

Post by Dave (imported) »

I'm just venturing my thoughts...

a) I missed the awkwardness of using the descriptive "tranny" ... I have added it to my list of things not to say. Not that I use the word. Transvestites and transgender rarely enter my discussion. The most recent being a reference to Les Ballets Trockedreros De Monte Carlo observation when an ill-informed straight friend saw the "Trocks" advertisement and wondered if they should go see them as that person wasn't a ballet fan. We (and it was more than me) informed the person that this was men en-point and intended to be funny. Not the introduction to the dance they thought it might be.

and

b) I was going to say "Hi, glad to see you." to Punky but I didn't because I didn't know her mood. As Hamlet said "that's the rub" ...
Eunuchorn (imported)
Posts: 267
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2001 8:39 pm

Posting Rank

Re: It's time for a discusion about etiquette.

Post by Eunuchorn (imported) »

What site is that?
Eunuchorn (imported)
Posts: 267
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2001 8:39 pm

Posting Rank

Re: It's time for a discusion about etiquette.

Post by Eunuchorn (imported) »

Slammr (imported) wrote: Mon Apr 08, 2013 1:08 pm I will readily ban people from my site.

What site is this?
cheetaking243 (imported)
Posts: 422
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 1:35 pm

Posting Rank

Re: It's time for a discusion about etiquette.

Post by cheetaking243 (imported) »

I really don't see what the big deal is. I'm transsexual, and yet I really do NOT understand why some people seem to take such offense to everything, even stereotypically-derogatory words.

Maybe that's just because of who I am, though. I'm a chill person, I like to give people the benefit of the doubt, and assume the best in everyone. I don't understand the whole "crusaders for justice" mindset where every single little thing that is said is a menace to society that must be corrected or else.

Likewise, I also don't agree with banning people just for expressing this mindset. Because although I don't personally understand it, it is still just someone expressing their opinion. And I feel like a lot of diversity and perspective is lost when certain mindsets and opinions are viewed as unacceptable.

Anyway, just my 2 cents. I'm really not in any position to question the decisions that are made here, I just kind of sit back and watch them happen, but yeah, that's what I feel.
foxytaur (imported)
Posts: 693
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 12:24 pm

Posting Rank

Re: It's time for a discusion about etiquette.

Post by foxytaur (imported) »

I have and never will go the activist route. It's too much hassle over very little gain these days.(Unless of course you wanna find yourself dead one day, you can't force everyone to be measure up to your biased standards)

Activism also tends to fragment into transphobia a lot too. Ive noticed

And Once again it's the pretty trans girls who can pass easily that they clump together and show everybody else how

un womanly they really are. Oh for fuck sakes put a sock in it.

We get it, you transitioned early. Fuck Id do anything to transition early. Im trying to beat father time.

Im actually deeply considering joining the canadian navy forces to continue my trainning as a systems engineer officer.

(It helps belonging to a program, which is halfway finished, that is acredited by the armed forces of canada)

I haven't decided yet but this is really sounding good considering there are now heavy trans policies that can make it easier to transition at the expense of yrs of service. (id gladly sign a part of my life away in favour of regaining the vestige of my happines later on. After all theres no such thing as a free meal so why the heck not?!!! An eye for an eye really.

A sacrifice of some of my freedom to regain my sanity.

But seriously, I have to deal with you girls too?

Just you wait. I'll be pretty like you too. And physically at that.

You may be pretty but you are ugly on the inside.

Funny that some of these "harry bejamin cases" have the nerve to spit on the rest of the queer comunity
Riverwind (imported)
Posts: 7558
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2001 5:58 am

Posting Rank

Re: It's time for a discusion about etiquette.

Post by Riverwind (imported) »

This site did not start out as a site for transgendered persons, it started as a story board for eunuchs the rest came later. I think because we see all of you as family and except you for who you are, we have become the number one site for people in flux. Male to eunuch, Male to Female, etc. I guess my point is that when I first started coming here we did not have any ladies, now the board is full of them and we are better for it.

Remember its not whats between your legs that defines you its whats between your ears, and each of us has had to come to grips with that one way or the other, for me it was becoming the eunuch that was always inside me and I have never been happier, I am complete.

River
Eunuchorn (imported)
Posts: 267
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2001 8:39 pm

Posting Rank

Re: It's time for a discusion about etiquette.

Post by Eunuchorn (imported) »

A general discussion of etiquette is not a bad thing. Let's expand on this. not just as it pertains to self-identity, but to formal matters. Is Judith Martin better than Amy Vanderbilt? I suspect that there is a lot that they both agree on. How to set a table. How to behave in business meeting, a party, and even in the locker room after a game. I studied the Judith Martin Miss Manners Basic Training trilogy. I like it. I also have read the Cuss Control book. (Rapscallious rebellion against Dad, who could blister paint when working on something and it would not do what he wanted) Dad once assured me that any time you had to take one thing apart to get at something else that was broken, it was Japanese. now, mind you, he said this while working on an Air Cooled Volkswagen Beetle, and I called him on it. he replied that the Japanese had a treaty with German and so they counted as Japanese, too. I still love my dad, but some footprints I won't step into.
jemagirl (imported)
Posts: 1291
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 6:02 pm

Posting Rank

Re: It's time for a discusion about etiquette.

Post by jemagirl (imported) »

After reading several of the thoughtful posts on this thread I'm allowing my self to evolve on this a bit. This happened early on. Even so I wanted to wait a bit before i brought this up. I hope no one will think badly of me for complicating this matter a bit, but there are also those who self identify as trannies. Some of these are drag queens, which is more of a vocation than a lifestyle but for some m2f girls drag provides a safe place to try things out.

If we can handle a little ambiguity, and I hope we can we should focus less on the words than just playing nice with each other.
Riverwind (imported)
Posts: 7558
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2001 5:58 am

Posting Rank

Re: It's time for a discusion about etiquette.

Post by Riverwind (imported) »

And that will be the final word,

I think everybody has chimed in and with good ideas I will make this a sticky and close it at least for now.

Thank you all for your participation.
Post Reply