Why castrates and eunuchs are better for females than males...

For castration-related posts that just don’t seem to fit anywhere else.
Post Reply
Westfolding (imported)
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Jun 22, 2002 2:01 pm

Posting Rank

Why castrates and eunuchs are better for females than males...

Post by Westfolding (imported) »

Why are castrates or eunuchs better than males?

Remarks:

Castrate has no testicles only, but has a penis.

Eunuch has nothing at all.

Castrato's preferences.

No threat of pregnancy

He is always able

He can pump you in non-stop mode a very long time

His penis is always hard

His testicles don't spank your сunt

He is much more attentive to you

When you touch his crotch, it's very unusual

You shouldn't go to wash after sex with him

He never needs a shave

You had never experienced such sensations

Eunuch's preferences.

No threat of pregnancy

He is always able to lick and finger you

He can lick you in non-stop mode endless time

No attempts even to try screwing you up

He is much more attentive to you

When you touch his empty crotch, it's very unusual

You shouldn't go to wash after sex with him

A eunuch will never cum in your mouth

He never needs a shave

A eunuch never leaves the seat up

Your relations with him are much warmer than relations with your best friend

You had never experienced such sensations
Andrew (imported)
Posts: 1787
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2001 10:05 pm

Posting Rank

Re: Why castrates and eunuchs are better for females than males...

Post by Andrew (imported) »

Westfolding (imported) wrote: Mon Jun 16, 2003 12:17 pm Castrate has no testicles only, but has a penis.

Eunuch has nothing at all.

That may be your OPINION, but it is certainly not backed up by common usage or the dictionaries. I have a penis, but no testicles. Nonetheless, I am a EUNUCH, defined as a castrated male.

✂️🔪 ✂️🔪 ✂️🔪 ✂️🔪 ✂️🔪 ✂️🔪 ✂️🔪 ✂️🔪 ✂️🔪 ✂️🔪 ✂️🔪 ✡️
Westfolding (imported)
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Jun 22, 2002 2:01 pm

Posting Rank

Re: Why castrates and eunuchs are better for females than males...

Post by Westfolding (imported) »

Dear Andrew,

of course, I respect you very much and I envy you - you wanted to do it and you made it.

But - frankly telling - eunuch is a male without all parts, in opposite case eunuchs weren't in use for female's guard...

Sorry, now I have a few time for reply.

But I promise you to answer with more long mail...

If you are Yahoo-user, my nick there is yasen_ru.

Possibly we could chat in online mode?

I will be glad to see you in Yahoo...

With best regards and great respect

Westfolding
º¿º (imported)
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 12:34 am

Posting Rank

Re: Why castrates and eunuchs are better for females than males...

Post by º¿º (imported) »

Westfolding,

Andrew is absolutely correct.

According to Webster's dictionary a Eunuch is a castrated man. Also according to Webster's dictionary, to castrate means to remove the testicles. Therefore a man with no testicles is a Eunuch.

I have been a Eunuch for three years so I think I know enough about being a Eunuch to accurately reply to your post. Until a few weeks ago I hadn't taken any HRT. Now I am on 5mg/day of Androderm because I have osteopenia. So far my sex drive has not returned and I hope it doesn't.

"No threat of pregnancy"

True.

"He is always able"

Not necessarily.

"
Westfolding (imported) wrote: Mon Jun 16, 2003 12:17 pm He can pump you in non-stop mode a very long time
"

Not necessarily.

"His penis is always hard"

Definitely not. In most cases his penis is rarely or never hard.

"His testicles don't spank your cunt"

Not unless he takes them out of the jar.

"He is much more attentive to you"

If you mean sexually, then that is not always the case. Many Eunuchs have no interest in sex.

"
Westfolding (imported) wrote: Mon Jun 16, 2003 12:17 pm When you touch his crotch, it's very unusual"

True.

"You shouldn't go to wash after sex with him
"

Maybe not, but he will probably want to wash after sex with you.

"He never needs a shave"

Only if he was castrated before puberty.

"
Westfolding (imported) wrote: Mon Jun 16, 2003 12:17 pm You had never experienced such sensations
"

How would the sensation be any different?

"He is always able to lick and finger you"

He might be able, but that doesn't mean he wants to.

"
Westfolding (imported) wrote: Mon Jun 16, 2003 12:17 pm He can lick you in non-stop mode endless time
"

Eunuchs don't have super endurance. If you had ever licked a pussy before you would know that after a while your mouth gets tired.

"
Westfolding (imported) wrote: Mon Jun 16, 2003 12:17 pm No attempts even to try screwing you up
"

He probably wouldn't want to unless he was on HRT. Even then he might not want to.

"A eunuch will never cum in your mouth"

That isn't necessarily true.

"A eunuch never leaves the seat up"

Wrong again.

"
Westfolding (imported) wrote: Mon Jun 16, 2003 12:17 pm Your relations with him are much warmer than relations with your best friend
"

That would depend on the individuals involved.

I hope for your sake you get the fantasy of being a Eunuch separated from the reality of being a Eunuch before you do anything drastic. If you want sex then this probably is not the path for you. If you want to lose your sex drive and get osteopenia or osteoporosis then go for it.
Tomas (imported)
Posts: 173
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2002 12:14 pm

Posting Rank

Re: Why castrates and eunuchs are better for females than males...

Post by Tomas (imported) »

Of course, Websters also now says "ain't" is a word and "irregardless" ...

It reflects usage rather than being a definitive compendium of words.

The meaning of "eunuch" or "eunuchos" or whatever has been different over time and cultures. In China, Westfolding would have been 100% correct. In some other cultures he probably would have been, also.

I tend to prefer (and that's all it is, a preference) the older definitions that had different words for castration and emasculation: Castrato and Eunucho. I don't get all excited about folks using "eunuch" for castrati, expecially since the latter seems less, uh, "elegant" to some, even though more descriptive.

Personally, even though modern usage has totally blurred the usage, I tend to like the differentiation offered by using different words for the different results.

In the mean time, Webster's is God's Word to some so ...

http://home.earthlink.net/~imagepool/tomsig03.gif

http://home.earthlink.net/~imagepool/MFZ.gif (http://home.earthlink.net/~imagepool/denied.html)
ALLREADYDONE (imported)
Posts: 53
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 6:10 pm

Posting Rank

Re: Why castrates and eunuchs are better for females than males...

Post by ALLREADYDONE (imported) »

Westfolding there was a reason harem guards had their balls removed. Because it was unlikely that they would be able to acheive a errection powerfull enough to have intercourse with women. You won't see many eunuchs with one of thoes errections that strech the skin tight with the swollen head pointing tward his chin. Even in the company of naked aroused women the eunuch will be soft or mabie if he is luckey slightly swolen but unable to penatrate even a very wet lady. Castration works, if I had a harem I would feel safe with a eunuch watching over even the most sexually aroused women.
C van D (imported)
Posts: 215
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 3:16 pm

Posting Rank

Re: Why castrates and eunuchs are better for females than males...

Post by C van D (imported) »

Unsure where Westfolding gets his definitions from. Chinese court eunuchs lost everything. So did the black eunuchs of the Ottoman empire, whereas the white eunuchs only had their balls taken out, as a rule before puberty (this inhibited penile growth). As for the castrati of 17th century Italy these did not have their balls taken right out as a rule; the practice was to sever or crush the spermatic cords, so that the balls dried up. Your latest correspondent suggests that harem guards would be unable to get full erections. Can I refer him to the 1001 Nights and the story of Bukhayt, the first eunuch. He gets his balls taken out at age 13 but goes on screwing the girl for years!

C van D
robi (imported)
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 4:12 am

Posting Rank

Re: Why castrates and eunuchs are better for females than males...

Post by robi (imported) »

C van D (imported) wrote: Sun Jun 29, 2003 3:40 pm Unsure where Westfolding gets his definitions from. Chinese court eunuchs lost everything. So did the black eunuchs of the Ottoman empire, whereas the white eunuchs only had their balls taken out, as a rule before puberty (this inhibited penile growth). As for the castrati of 17th century Italy these did not have their balls taken right out as a rule; the practice was to sever or crush the spermatic cords, so that the balls dried up. Your latest correspondent suggests that harem guards would be unable to get full erections. Can I refer him to the 1001 Nights and the story of Bukhayt, the first eunuch. He gets his balls taken out at age 13 but goes on screwing the girl for years!

C van D

But Eunuchs have some disadvantages, they are goin to be fat - in most case. And I think this is very bad for his healthness.

How does a Eunuch keep his body in strenght? And he never - not with testosteron-injection - get a hard cock?

robi
Paolo
Posts: 9709
Joined: Wed May 16, 2001 1:53 am

Posting Rank

Re: Why castrates and eunuchs are better for females than males...

Post by Paolo »

robi (imported) wrote: Tue Jul 01, 2003 8:20 am But Eunuchs have some disadvantages, they are goin to be fat - in most case. And I think this is very bad for his healthness.

How does a Eunuch keep his body in strenght? And he never - not with testosteron-injection - get a hard cock?

robi

The problem with body fat is the combination of diet and lack of exercise.

Processed modern foods, not just fast foods, are loaded with complex carbohydrates and sugars. They may be fat free, but that doesn't help. As the Atkins diet states (and it's true, I know), when all those carbs and sugars hit a body that isn't that active, it turns into fat.

When I was teenager, and struggling with puberty that just wasn't working, I was about as round as I was tall. In the 6th grade, I wore 36" pants. The cure? Exercise - mowing the lawn, riding a bike, cutting wood, etc., and no sugars. No rooty vegetables. No soda. No bread. That left meat and leafy veggies. Over the summer, I lost like 50 pounds. (I still got the long arms and had a little pot belly that was hard to get rid of, though. God, the hell I took over that!)

The popular Atkins diet states basically the same thing about weight loss.

You also have to watch that calcium intake. Eunuchs are subject to brittle bones, you know. I found this out (being hypogonadic) by punching out my old truck and breaking my hand in the process! Some years before, I beat the windshield out of my Mustang Gt with my bare hands and didn't bat an eye over it.

As for the hard cock, well, it varies from person to person.

🚬
Andrew (imported)
Posts: 1787
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2001 10:05 pm

Posting Rank

Re: Why castrates and eunuchs are better for females than males...

Post by Andrew (imported) »

robi (imported) wrote: Tue Jul 01, 2003 8:20 am But Eunuchs have some disadvantages, they are goin to be fat - in most case. And I think this is very bad for his healthness.

How does a Eunuch keep his body in strenght? And he never - not with testosteron-injection - get a hard cock?

robi

First off, the eunuch cannot build up the muscle mass of an intact male, true. He is like a woman in this respect. And like a lot of women, he can have respectable weight and muscles from a proper diet and exercise program. You should see my aerobics and yoga instructers.

As for not getting an erection without testosterone injection --- MAYBE. YMWV = Your Milage Will Vary. It will depend on age at castration, how long you have been castrated, how much testosterone and estrogen your adrenal glands are putting out, and other factors poorly understood.

In my case, as a modest example, I was castrated at age 56. Nowadays I can, if I want to, masturbate every couple of months, get a usefull erection, and have a dry orgasm. Nice, but not essential. And if I wanted to ignore sex altogether, I could do so without physical discomfort.

🚶 ⛵ ✡️ 🤪 :catclock: 🐱
littletits (imported)
Posts: 83
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:19 pm

Posting Rank

Re: Why castrates and eunuchs are better for females than males...

Post by littletits (imported) »

I notice reading this thread that there is much discussion on what exactly constitutes a true Eunuch. I am castrated for a litle over five years after my balls were pulped in an accident. The erectile ability of my penis was also destroyed so I have a limp noodle for a penis. Am I a nullo wth penis or Eunuch without balls only for those who like splitting hairs. Personally I identify as Eunuch and will continue to so. As far sex is concerned it is totally off the menu as it would be for a straight nullo whose anus is an exit hole only with no disrespect to othe who employ it as part of their genitals
justjustin (imported)
Posts: 98
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 4:25 pm

Posting Rank

Re: Why castrates and eunuchs are better for females than males...

Post by justjustin (imported) »

Farm animals and cats and dogs that are castrated early, lose interest in sex and do not have erections. A stallion that is castrated after maturity may still act 'studdy' but usually can't do the job. Why does anyone think that humans might be different? I think a lot is fantasy, and stories about eunuchs haveing lots of sex is just nonsense.
littletits (imported)
Posts: 83
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:19 pm

Posting Rank

Re: Why castrates and eunuchs are better for females than males...

Post by littletits (imported) »

I Had my testicles removed five years ago.I have a very small shrunken penis. I have about the same size I had entering puberty. My penis was irreperably damaged in the accident that resulted in my castration and can never get erect again.There was severe damage to the vascular system and there was considerable doubt at the time whether it would recover or have to be removed. It took three weeks before my doctors were happy to leave it attached. In hindsight it would have made little difference if it was removed. I tried testosterone for a while. It gave me a raging libido but nothing else other than frustration. I finally accepted that I was a Eunuch one day standing in front of a full length mirror after coming out of the shower. I had an injection of of T that morning. I lifted my limp penis and looked at my empty scrotum and said to myself. I am a Eunuch. I am not and never again will be a man. No amount of T will ever restore my manhood. I never took another injection of T again. My sex drive dissapeared like the snow of last winter. I had all the side effects of no T but my body adjusted as did my mind.I am a Eunuch. I identify as a Eunuch and strangely I am happy as a Eunuch. For those who get off on splitting hairs I have a penis but I am still a Eunuch and not something more or less.

I now take estrogen and have absolutely no sex drive. Rounded female breasts are a side effect but I can cope with them unless I turn into a version of Dolly Parton but they are getting larger week by week and are now almost a full B cup. I can never have sex again but I wont get testicular cancer either. Thats what killed my father at 42. Eunuchs and especially no T eunuchs having lots of sex or any sex is as, Justjustin said,nonsense. I can scarcely remember what an erection and an orgasm felt like. I don't miss either.
Jorge2008 (imported)
Posts: 189
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2011 2:36 am

Posting Rank

Re: Why castrates and eunuchs are better for females than males...

Post by Jorge2008 (imported) »

littletits (imported) wrote: Sat Jan 07, 2012 1:34 am Rounded female breasts are a side effect but I can cope with them unless I turn into a version of Dolly Parton but they are getting larger week by week and are now almost a full B cup.

You have decided not to use medications against gynecomastia, i.e. many members of this forum are taking Tamoxifen in order to avoid it, whilst trying chemical castration?
littletits (imported)
Posts: 83
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:19 pm

Posting Rank

Re: Why castrates and eunuchs are better for females than males...

Post by littletits (imported) »

That is correct Jorge 2008. I am curious as to what the full effects will be. I am mostly enjoying the changes to my body and most, of all to my mind. I can pass as a woman and that is something that never crossed my mind while intact. If it becomes necessary I may well go all the way to full gender change. The way I look on it castration robbed me of my manhood and left me in gender limbo. With a female body I would fit in and identify with half the worlds population.Would I like it? Difficult to tell but I feel I would be Ok with it. Could I do it? Yes without any problem. In private and with immediate family I always present as a woman. My mother and sister are constantly encouraging me to go the whole hog. As it is I no longer have any male underwear. Female underwear is not a fetish; it is what fits and supports my changing shape. For those who asked I will be a Eunuch for six years on the 3rd of september this year. Castrated on the 3/9/2006. Knowing what I now know ,while I would never seek out voluntary castration but having it thrust upon me is not the nightmare I thought it was in the first days and weeks.
Post Reply